I just realised that there is a distinction to be made here:
1) I am all for non-smoking card rooms.
2) I am all against a _ban_ on smoking in card rooms.
The two aren't mutually exclusive.
I'm sure it'll be crystal clear when you explain it but I'm missing te distinction
Well its simple really: I think there should be non-smoking card rooms (for people like you and I can happily plan in.)
However I also think an overarching ban government ban on smoking in
all card rooms is imposing a selfish personal desire on the whole population. Hence there should also be some card rooms where the addicted can happily play and puff away in comfort (which are obviously to be avoided if you take responsibility for your health).
As such I think my personal standpoint is that I would promote smoking areas (such as walsall), better ventilation and encourage as many non-smoking cardrooms as possible, without stomping my feet for a sweeping ban (bad strategy imo as it entrenches opinion on both sides).
Ok, so here's a suggestion for you Adam: instead of demanding a ban, how about you promote a "non-smoking night" in the card room at the gala for starters. If you think there's any merit in that, then let me know (I'll be at the gala with snoops today for the sunday afternoon freezout), and I'll offer my support.