|
TightEnd
|
 |
« Reply #9375 on: April 19, 2010, 04:41:50 PM » |
|
Mine is 0.077%
Nice site, would have saved me a lot of prattling on earlier if I knew about it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #9376 on: April 19, 2010, 04:49:46 PM » |
|
I have 3xaverage which I shall be wasting
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Bongo
|
|
« Reply #9377 on: April 19, 2010, 04:49:54 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
|
|
|
|
cdw1111
|
|
« Reply #9378 on: April 19, 2010, 04:56:50 PM » |
|
0.080%
Thought it was a safe seat,but thats still surprising.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
shy bairns get nowt
|
|
|
|
kinboshi
|
|
« Reply #9379 on: April 19, 2010, 04:57:39 PM » |
|
I have 1.36x the UK average voting power - but three of the least inspirational choices possible. They've also changed the boundaries of my constituency, so that might make a difference or not, maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #9380 on: April 19, 2010, 05:00:15 PM » |
|
I don't really get this. I have 0.852 votes which is 3.37 x average. so 1 vote is equal to about 4 x average? is that right? surely 1 vote would be average?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Bongo
|
|
« Reply #9381 on: April 19, 2010, 05:01:51 PM » |
|
I guess they are using a non mean average.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #9382 on: April 19, 2010, 05:07:35 PM » |
|
I guess they are using a non mean average.
yeah that'd make sense. seems odd though |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Jon MW
|
|
« Reply #9383 on: April 19, 2010, 05:09:42 PM » |
|
I don't really get this. I have 0.852 votes which is 3.37 x average. so 1 vote is equal to about 4 x average? is that right? surely 1 vote would be average?
I've seen the site before, I think it's very much working towards it's own agenda and using the statistics to 'prove' that. For example, when people say only a few votes count because the safe seats are sewn up they can use that to amend the averages - so it ignores the fact that all the people who vote in those safe seats for the winning party have got votes that count. I don't think I wrote that well, but does that make sense? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #9384 on: April 19, 2010, 05:13:25 PM » |
|
I don't really get this. I have 0.852 votes which is 3.37 x average. so 1 vote is equal to about 4 x average? is that right? surely 1 vote would be average?
I've seen the site before, I think it's very much working towards it's own agenda and using the statistics to 'prove' that. For example, when people say only a few votes count because the safe seats are sewn up they can use that to amend the averages - so it ignores the fact that all the people who vote in those safe seats for the winning party have got votes that count. I don't think I wrote that well, but does that make sense? yeah, makes sense and I agree. I abs hate that 'the election comes down to less than 100k voters' argument because it's complete bollocks and really flawed/skewed logic even though it sounds good |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Jon MW
|
|
« Reply #9385 on: April 19, 2010, 05:18:43 PM » |
|
Although as a mathematician I'm quite impressed, because nothing they'd done is technically incorrect (like a lot of politicians do) - it's just the interpretation they use which give's it the narrative story they want - and because it's all numbers most people think that = proof.
You can analyse different voting systems with numbers but ultimately the strengths and weaknesses of different ways aren't statistical, they're subjective and political - the statistics just gives it a veneer of objectivity
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
|
|
|
|
typhoon13
|
|
« Reply #9386 on: April 19, 2010, 05:30:12 PM » |
|
Cant be bothered to research but is there any party offering zero per cent tax on earnings 0f £80k per year???
TIA
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #9387 on: April 19, 2010, 05:30:49 PM » |
|
A vote for proportional representation is a vote for the BNP.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
|
« Reply #9388 on: April 19, 2010, 06:35:19 PM » |
|
Cant be bothered to research but is there any party offering zero per cent tax on earnings 0f £80k per year???
TIA
Worst blatant brag on Blonde ever,FACT  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
typhoon13
|
|
« Reply #9389 on: April 19, 2010, 06:39:36 PM » |
|
Cant be bothered to research but is there any party offering zero per cent tax on earnings 0f £80k per year???
TIA
Worst blatant brag on Blonde ever,FACT LOL |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 19, 2010, 06:46:30 PM by typhoon13 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author