|
Marky147
|
 |
« Reply #1710 on: December 26, 2013, 09:39:40 PM » |
|
Rantaments  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cf
|
|
« Reply #1711 on: December 29, 2013, 10:03:55 AM » |
|
I'm looking forward to the Arsenal game. For once it realistically feels like we can get something from it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Blue text
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #1712 on: January 12, 2014, 02:59:18 PM » |
|
Cannot believe that was disallowed...
Worst thing is, Newcastle are likely to end up with about 8 players on the pitch now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
|
« Reply #1713 on: January 12, 2014, 03:00:07 PM » |
|
Seems harsh  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #1714 on: January 12, 2014, 03:10:05 PM » |
|
I fear for pleno's health.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
|
pleno1
|
|
« Reply #1715 on: January 12, 2014, 05:06:24 PM » |
|
i cant watch us with remy or cisse on the pitch
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
|
Ant040689
|
|
« Reply #1716 on: January 13, 2014, 02:17:45 PM » |
|
Just seen the highlights and a little annoyed by Danny Mills view on this, not looking to rile, but agree with the officials that Goffran is offside, merely for his off-putting placement to Hart. He could potentially deflect the ball in, so Hart instinctively doesn't dive with him there. If he isn't there Hart dives, even if he isn't going to get it. That is an interference, so a just decision.
What should be of more concern is the lackadaisical way Goffran was initially trying to get back onside, had no business to be standing where he was.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
|
« Reply #1717 on: January 13, 2014, 02:21:19 PM » |
|
Thought it was pretty hilarious people, inc Pardumb, suggesting the goal should stand because it was a worldy, huh what ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #1718 on: January 13, 2014, 02:27:37 PM » |
|
I agree. That decision could have gone either way - very marginal.
I listened to 606 on Sunday night and they were going on about it for about an hour. No idea why.
Watford once "conceded" a goal when the Reading striker headed the ball wide and nobody really commented on it !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ant040689
|
|
« Reply #1719 on: January 13, 2014, 02:39:13 PM » |
|
I agree. That decision could have gone either way - very marginal.
I listened to 606 on Sunday night and they were going on about it for about an hour. No idea why.
Watford once "conceded" a goal when the Reading striker headed the ball wide and nobody really commented on it !
It would have been huge had you been in the Prem. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ant040689
|
|
« Reply #1720 on: January 13, 2014, 02:42:32 PM » |
|
Thought it was pretty hilarious people, inc Pardumb, suggesting the goal should stand because it was a worldy, huh what ?
No-one likes to see beauty removed from the provider, hence the strength in uproar. Add in the importance of the goal and you have an emotional brew there. Man City looked very tough to play against yesterday. I thought for the first goal, Dzeko's one, I think it is Williamson that could have done more to put a foot in when the cross came in before it got to the scorer, but just assumed things would be alright. It is a shame, as you were hit so early it changes the dynamic from the start. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tikay
|
|
« Reply #1721 on: January 13, 2014, 02:42:48 PM » |
|
I agree. That decision could have gone either way - very marginal.
I listened to 606 on Sunday night and they were going on about it for about an hour. No idea why.
Watford once "conceded" a goal when the Reading striker headed the ball wide and nobody really commented on it !
It would have been huge had you been in the Prem.Outrageous rub. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016). |
|
|
|
Ant040689
|
|
« Reply #1722 on: January 13, 2014, 03:49:36 PM » |
|
I agree. That decision could have gone either way - very marginal.
I listened to 606 on Sunday night and they were going on about it for about an hour. No idea why.
Watford once "conceded" a goal when the Reading striker headed the ball wide and nobody really commented on it !
It would have been huge had you been in the Prem.Outrageous rub. Ha, obv not Dung, but if I did intentially want it to be read like that what a douche I would be  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #1723 on: January 13, 2014, 03:59:22 PM » |
|
It was pure vindictiveness  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
 Offline
Posts: 10064
Go Ducks!
|
|
« Reply #1724 on: January 13, 2014, 04:19:44 PM » |
|
Watford once "conceded" a goal when the Reading striker headed the ball wide and nobody really commented on it !
This was pretty awesome to be fair! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author