scotty2hatty
|
 |
« Reply #2640 on: October 23, 2015, 01:24:05 PM » |
|
Price melted, hopefully it was someone on here that got it all.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2641 on: October 23, 2015, 10:30:42 PM » |
|
gotta be a big bias on inside at sunderland. only none 1/2 trap winner was handicap and it came it inside (incred so)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #2642 on: October 23, 2015, 10:34:20 PM » |
|
agreed. There was a massive late gamble on that t1 in last at sunderland (before the withdrawn t3) backed all the way down to evens for several grand before the reformed market. The way it got up would suggest its def suiting the inside and how long t2 stayed in front. It went off evens on the reformed market even when the 2nd fav was taken out.
|
|
« Last Edit: October 23, 2015, 10:38:23 PM by arbboy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2643 on: October 23, 2015, 10:51:10 PM » |
|
well that jinxed that
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #2644 on: October 23, 2015, 10:52:08 PM » |
|
standard on this thread any time bias is mentioned. I just laid the last two winners. Done my dough tonight now!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2645 on: October 23, 2015, 10:54:06 PM » |
|
standard on this thread any time bias is mentioned. I just laid the last two winners. Done my dough tonight now!
similar. Had the wrong two insides lead up, still think theres a bias the leader just keeps chucking it/ is outstayed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2646 on: October 23, 2015, 11:14:07 PM » |
|
that was a pretty incred break at romford.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #2647 on: October 23, 2015, 11:16:15 PM » |
|
very slow time given the trapping 24.48. I was expecting 24.10 at worse. Track must be incredibly slow tonight.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2648 on: October 23, 2015, 11:24:41 PM » |
|
very slow time given the trapping 24.48. I was expecting 24.10 at worse. Track must be incredibly slow tonight.
well the rest looked like they were in quicksand. 1 dog at sunderland stuck to the rail (prob why it was gambled as a proper railer?) and it was a slaughter
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #2649 on: October 30, 2015, 09:07:32 PM » |
|
Looks decent outside bias at romford if anyone is playing tonight on ch212.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2650 on: October 30, 2015, 09:39:55 PM » |
|
Looks decent outside bias at romford if anyone is playing tonight on ch212.
yeah there is, how does six win there? and is it a void?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #2651 on: October 30, 2015, 09:41:04 PM » |
|
Looks decent outside bias at romford if anyone is playing tonight on ch212.
yeah there is, how does six win there? and is it a void? Course it will be! I laid 1 and 3!!! t6 had to lead to win, doesn't lead, falls out and still wins! Comical how they void the race even though the dogs who benefitted most from the traps opening late get beat ad the dogs hindered the most win!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2652 on: October 30, 2015, 09:44:39 PM » |
|
Looks decent outside bias at romford if anyone is playing tonight on ch212.
yeah there is, how does six win there? and is it a void? Course it will be! I laid 1 and 3!!! t6 had to lead to win, doesn't lead, falls out and still wins! Comical how they void the race even though the dogs who benefitted most from the traps opening late get beat ad the dogs hindered the most win! I had 56 RF lol, couldnt believe 6 would ever get up for second let alone win comfortably.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #2653 on: October 30, 2015, 09:52:46 PM » |
|
void race confirmed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #2654 on: October 30, 2015, 09:53:40 PM » |
|
void race confirmed.
threads so jinxed
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|