blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 29, 2025, 06:52:51 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262555 Posts in 66610 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  AK late in a $550 STT
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: AK late in a $550 STT  (Read 14916 times)
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2010, 10:43:24 PM »

I really doubt you need to 68% fave here.

If you call and win: Your equity= 47.7% of the prize pool

Call and lose: You equity = .03%

Fold = 18.7%.

If my maths are right you can get it in as 40/60 dog and it will still be a good call.

Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16737


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2010, 10:52:38 PM »

I ran it through an ICM calculator and on a 60/40 split.  If I just push and don't get called I am 35.48 afterwards.  If I win vs big stack I am 52.33.  If I lose I am as near zero as makes no difference.  .68 x 52.33 is roughly 35.48.

My choice here is either push or raise call and that was what I did the percents on.  I never raise/fold. 
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16737


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2010, 10:55:57 PM »

he is slightly ahead long run.  My roi is 2% with him at the table and his is 4% over 350 games, but don't really see that as important.  And there are probably quite a few games missing, so it isn't conclusive.  As I said earlier I think he is best at the table.  If there were 5 others as good as him at the table I wouldn't have sat down!
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2010, 10:59:12 PM »


I ran it through an ICM calculator and on a 60/40 split.  If I just push and don't get called I am 35.48 afterwards.  If I win vs big stack I am 52.33.  If I lose I am as near zero as makes no difference.  .68 x 52.33 is roughly 35.48.

My choice here is either push or raise call and that was what I did the percents on.  I never raise/fold.  

Ah ok yeah raise/folding isn't an option i get it now.

Though running it on never getting called isn't realistic as you will get called a certain % of the time.

Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 17, 2010, 11:03:11 PM »

I really doubt you need to 68% fave here.

If you call and win: Your equity= 47.7% of the prize pool

Call and lose: You equity = .03%

Fold = 18.7%.

If my maths are right you can get it in as 40/60 dog and it will still be a good call.



He's weighing up raise-call line vs shove pre line
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16737


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 17, 2010, 11:11:29 PM »

ofc, running it without anybody calling isn't realistic, but is a lot easier!    I think it probably cancels out abit.  As I am going to be at least 50% vs a typical calling range by any of the stacks after me?
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 17, 2010, 11:18:46 PM »

I ran it through an ICM calculator and on a 60/40 split.  If I just push and don't get called I am 35.48 afterwards.  If I win vs big stack I am 52.33.  If I lose I am as near zero as makes no difference.  .68 x 52.33 is roughly 35.48.

My choice here is either push or raise call and that was what I did the percents on.  I never raise/fold.  

This assumes villain's 3 bet range is 100%?

Surely the result sometimes when we raise is that villain folds, we win blinds, or go up against 1,400 BB player.


Also, as Longy points out, you winning only the blinds only is not the only possible result from a push. If villain has QQ,KK,AA he is going to snap us. Other factors (such as big blind calling) will help pull the number the other way.


ofc, running it without anybody calling isn't realistic, but is a lot easier!    I think it probably cancels out abit.  As I am going to be at least 50% vs a typical calling range by any of the stacks after me?


There will be a certain amount of cancelling out with the big blind between the two lines.

I think you wil be crushed by villain in the small blind though if he calls your shove. You'll be lucky to have 40%. (and even if we were 50% vs his calling of your shove, that would mean we could ignore cEV, but not $EV.)


Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 17, 2010, 11:34:44 PM »


This assumes villain's 3 bet range is 100%?

Surely the result sometimes when we raise is that villain folds, we win blinds, or go up against 1,400 BB player.


this is the point I've been trying to make. badly it would seem. if we're saying that his rr range gives him 40% equity vs AKo then we're assuming he doesn't always rr
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16737


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 17, 2010, 11:35:57 PM »

Probably more complex than I first thought.  But I think if he has AA, KK and QQ there is no difference in the result.  I raise/call and am in a world of hurt or I push and am in a world of hurt Sad.  
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 17, 2010, 11:42:39 PM »

Probably more complex than I first thought.  But I think if he has AA, KK and QQ there is no difference in the result.  I raise/call and am in a world of hurt or I push and am in a world of hurt Sad

It will signifacantly reduce your 35.48% pp figure that you were using as the result you'd get from a pre flop push.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: February 18, 2010, 04:12:06 PM »

unless sngwiz has changed since I last used it isn't it going to ask you wtf you're doing shoving 16x and suggest you look at another way of playing it?
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2010, 04:41:20 PM »

not used it for at least 6 months, sure it used to hate anything over 10x
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: February 18, 2010, 04:43:19 PM »

we're comparing and contrasting the shove versus the raise call line.
 
wiz won't be much help with the merits of the raise call line. OP is looking to do that calculation for himself.

Wiz will give you a nice number for the shove line, but if we're manually doing the other line and looking to simplify things by as far as the shorter stacks are concerned then we should enter their calling ranges as 0%. Then once we have our raise call line number (similarly calculated with shorties never calling, as it would be a bitch to do otherwise) we can compare the two fairly.

Obv the shorties will be playing sometimes, quite a lot of the time even, but it's ok to assume the line we choose won't affect their ranges, and so any positive affect will affect both lines the same.

Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: February 18, 2010, 04:45:41 PM »

badly worded that, but I can't edit it the now

to clarify, the 38% figure I'm assuming was OP's result for his prize pool equity once he'd won just the blinds, rather than a wiz figure for prize pool equity from the shove.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2010, 04:53:37 PM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
StuartHopkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8145


Ocho cinco


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: February 18, 2010, 05:09:29 PM »

I think it isn't a question of if I should call, I was always going to.  My thinking is that it may well have been better ICM wise just picking up 300 chips than having a 60/40(I am guessing I am something like that vs his range) for 3000 more chips, yet a 40% chance of getting nothing.

when you have to make the decision whether to shove or to raise to induce you are opening the pot so have no idea of sb's range so how are you making a decision assuming you'll be 60/40?

Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii epic Gatso fail!

Of course he can assiign a range to what he thinks the SB would reshove with.
Logged

Only 23 days to go until the Berlin Marathon! Please sponsor me at www.virginmoneygiving.com/StuartHopkin
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.204 seconds with 20 queries.