poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 26, 2025, 09:07:49 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262448
Posts in
66607
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
Theoretical WSOP Question
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
Author
Topic: Theoretical WSOP Question (Read 13147 times)
pleno1
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 18912
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #45 on:
June 09, 2010, 05:41:17 PM »
you cant say "excuse me dealer can i just run over to the pavillion room and check on durrrrrs strack in the stud 10k? I have 88 and a hard decision, if i cant do that, maybe I could check wsop.com's chip counts and take 25k off what they say then make a decision".
Weve been in tourny for 2 hours how the hell are you going to know durrrrs stack?
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #46 on:
June 09, 2010, 05:55:38 PM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
Do you try and partonise everyone Mark?
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6735
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #47 on:
June 09, 2010, 06:09:47 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on June 09, 2010, 05:55:38 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
Do you try and partonise everyone Mark?
I've never called valid input daft. You always miss who patronises first Costantine.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #48 on:
June 09, 2010, 06:22:11 PM »
I just don't get why you all think he will be shoving wide, he has a 1hr break pretty sure he is going to just be playing fast but properly.
If he sits down to a premium though he can just shove and have a donkey hero call him.
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6089
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #49 on:
June 09, 2010, 06:49:34 PM »
I could be wrong, but I think the man with the bracelet just agreed with Mantis. . .
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
mondatoo
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22505
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #50 on:
June 09, 2010, 07:13:13 PM »
Quote from: david3103 on June 09, 2010, 06:49:34 PM
I could be wrong, but I think the man with the bracelet just agreed with Mantis. . .
Anybody can luckbox a bracelet
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #51 on:
June 09, 2010, 07:32:55 PM »
Quote from: Royal Flush on June 09, 2010, 06:22:11 PM
I just don't get why you all think he will be shoving wide, he has a 1hr break pretty sure he is going to just be playing fast but properly.
If he sits down to a premium though he can just shove and have a donkey hero call him.
Is shipping 60 bigs in pre the proper play with any hand?
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #52 on:
June 09, 2010, 08:06:15 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on June 09, 2010, 07:32:55 PM
Quote from: Royal Flush on June 09, 2010, 06:22:11 PM
I just don't get why you all think he will be shoving wide, he has a 1hr break pretty sure he is going to just be playing fast but properly.
If he sits down to a premium though he can just shove and have a donkey hero call him.
Is shipping 60 bigs in pre the proper play with any hand?
If people are going to be snapping 22 then yeah...
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17076
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #53 on:
June 09, 2010, 08:30:59 PM »
Quote from: Royal Flush on June 09, 2010, 08:06:15 PM
Quote from: GreekStein on June 09, 2010, 07:32:55 PM
Quote from: Royal Flush on June 09, 2010, 06:22:11 PM
I just don't get why you all think he will be shoving wide, he has a 1hr break pretty sure he is going to just be playing fast but properly.
If he sits down to a premium though he can just shove and have a donkey hero call him.
Is shipping 60 bigs in pre the proper play with any hand?
If people are going to be snapping 22 then yeah...
The situation is unique.
I wouldn't call with 22 in virtually any other spot.
It has to be first hand he sits down and he must still be in deep in another tournament.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #54 on:
June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
pokerfan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5551
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #55 on:
June 09, 2010, 09:41:39 PM »
Quote from: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on June 09, 2010, 01:19:16 PM
Quote from: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 12:51:45 PM
Quote from: Blatch on June 09, 2010, 03:13:37 AM
Gurantee no one would call with 22 here.
Probably are gonna side wider than what they actually would if in the actual situation.
I would say for me 66 up and AT up, maybe KQ
I guarantee I would call in these circumstances with 22 here.
You'd honestly call a pure 50/50 shot with 60 bigs in a comp where the field is not going to be great?
The advantage you get by having a double stack in these tournaments is absolutely huge.
Yes, the field is weak, but there's also at least another 10 of these tournaments to play.
In the main event my range would be AA or KK. In a 3000 runner donkament I would insta call with 22.
Blinds still to act too, theoretically of course.
Logged
http://twitter.com/#
!/@mally666
EvilPie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14241
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #56 on:
June 09, 2010, 09:55:09 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on June 09, 2010, 07:32:55 PM
Quote from: Royal Flush on June 09, 2010, 06:22:11 PM
I just don't get why you all think he will be shoving wide, he has a 1hr break pretty sure he is going to just be playing fast but properly.
If he sits down to a premium though he can just shove and have a donkey hero call him.
Is shipping 60 bigs in pre the proper play with any hand?
Judging by most of the responses on here I'd say yes if it's a premium but no if it's a bag of bollox.
Obviously in this specific situation sat with a bunch of heroes in a rush.
Logged
Motivational speeches at their best:
"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
EvilPie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14241
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #57 on:
June 09, 2010, 09:59:49 PM »
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
How can we talk about EV and a unique situation at the same time?
Surely for this to be +EV we need to have the same thing happen many times over.
As a one off we're just flipping and if we lose we're out. We don't get the same situation again 10000 times where we will win about 6000 of them so EV seems pretty irrelevant to me.
Logged
Motivational speeches at their best:
"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #58 on:
June 09, 2010, 10:04:43 PM »
Quote from: EvilPie on June 09, 2010, 09:59:49 PM
Surely for this to be +EV we need to have the same thing happen many times over.
no. there's a difference between ev and long term ev
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6735
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #59 on:
June 09, 2010, 10:10:17 PM »
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
True, it's possible he wants to just take a spin here. It's also possible he wants to sit down and play some good poker in this world series. Shipping a hand is good poker for Dwann. He prob lols at how good. Out of 3k people there will be so many hero donkeys wanting to take a shot...he needn't piss about playing the streets right, why waste of time? I'd be gutted if I had position on Dwann for the hour and he flipped A-K here. Truly and properly mugged off mate. How many tournaments are we playing again to make that worth the 51.2% edge?
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...