Tips for Tikay

[exstream]

This darts thingy, I haven't watched or know what the format is but with Taylor and Anderson both 1/5, how come winning 2-0 4/6 and 4/5?

[Chompy]

Front page of The Sun!

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/6677195/BBC-staff-in-10000-Bake-Off-betting-scandal.html

"They must think we're a bit thick", sayed David Williams, whose firm offered prices in autumn on a show recorded in the summer.

529 bets to take out £10k? That's an average profit of nearly £20 a bet, at 12-1 and downwards. Yikes!

[BorntoBubble]

This darts thingy, I haven't watched or know what the format is but with Taylor and Anderson both 1/5, how come winning 2-0 4/6 and 4/5?

I think although I am not sure and not followed this series that it's because the format favours the player with the throw.

So their opponents are going to be throwing first in one of the sets and in the shorter format that will give them an edge hence why 2-0 is not a certainty

[atdc21]

Front page of The Sun!

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/6677195/BBC-staff-in-10000-Bake-Off-betting-scandal.html

"They must think we're a bit thick", sayed David Williams, whose firm offered prices in autumn on a show recorded in the summer.

529 bets to take out £10k? That's an average profit of nearly £20 a bet, at 12-1 and downwards. Yikes!

I dont think they should be allowed to take bets on events that have already taken place. Things like this just alert them to shorten the odds on the winner, then gives them a freeroll to just cancel most of the bets.

[doubleup]

This darts thingy, I haven't watched or know what the format is but with Taylor and Anderson both 1/5, how come winning 2-0 4/6 and 4/5?

I think although I am not sure and not followed this series that it's because the format favours the player with the throw.

So their opponents are going to be throwing first in one of the sets and in the shorter format that will give them an edge hence why 2-0 is not a certainty

That was what I thought but unless the better player always throws first in two of the legs that doesn't quite add up as the underdog might get to throw first in two legs, so in that case they would have such a big advantage, half the time, that their opponent couldn't possibly be a 1/5 chance?

[kukushkin88]

This darts thingy, I haven't watched or know what the format is but with Taylor and Anderson both 1/5, how come winning 2-0 4/6 and 4/5?

I think although I am not sure and not followed this series that it's because the format favours the player with the throw.

So their opponents are going to be throwing first in one of the sets and in the shorter format that will give them an edge hence why 2-0 is not a certainty

That was what I thought but unless the better player always throws first in two of the legs that doesn't quite add up as the underdog might get to throw first in two legs, so in that case they would have such a big advantage, half the time, that their opponent couldn't possibly be a 1/5 chance?

Haven't looked in to it but my assumption would be that the 3rd set has to one by two clear legs, thereby negating the advantage of throwing first in that set. That basically works out on the maths.

[exstream]

Well my Anderson Taylor 2-0 double failed anyway

[nuros]

Wp Tighty last night, research and write up paid off!

[MattyHollis]

Wp Tighty last night, research and write up paid off!

Did it? I thought he tipped over 40.5?

[Stopsleyhatter]

Think it's a winner over 37.5

[TightEnd]

05/10/2015 14:25:14 BST   0000973   Single (Win)   1   £ 16.50   Detroit Lions at Seattle Seahawks - Player Props   Rushing Yards - R Wilson   Over 35.5   10/11   £ 31.50
04/10/2015 11:54:52 BST   0000972   Single (Win)   1   £ 10.00   Kansas City Chiefs at Cincinnati Bengals - Player Props   Rushing Yards - J Hill   Over 55.5   10/11   £ 0.00
04/10/2015 09:55:31 BST   0000971   Single (Win)   1   £ 16.50   New York Jets v Miami Dolphins - Player Props   Receiving Yards - B Marshall   Over 80.5   10/11   £ 31.50

[MattyHollis]

Ah nice - I looked late I guess as the line was 40.5 when I looked after seeing your post (around 10pm or so last night I think). Thought you had got chinned by his two kneels at the end. Well done. (I would put an exclamation mark at the end of that well done normally but some people moan about that around here)

[Karabiner]

What's happened to oddschecker?

Since the "upgrade" there's no drop-down menu so I can't find any greyhound racing odds as they are not a headline act. Even when I tried clicking the link on google for oddschecker.com/greyhounds it just takes me to the same homepage with no greyhound option that I can see. No search option either.

Grrrr

[MattyHollis]

What's happened to oddschecker?

Since the "upgrade" there's no drop-down menu so I can't find any greyhound racing odds as they are not a headline act. Even when I tried clicking the link on google for oddschecker.com/greyhounds it just takes me to the same homepage with no greyhound option that I can see. No search option either.

Grrrr

http://www.oddschecker.com/greyhounds/sittingbourne/19:11/winner

Try going through that? There is a dropdown box on the right of the sports across the top titled "All".

[TightEnd]

What's happened to oddschecker?

Since the "upgrade" there's no drop-down menu so I can't find any greyhound racing odds as they are not a headline act. Even when I tried clicking the link on google for oddschecker.com/greyhounds it just takes me to the same homepage with no greyhound option that I can see. No search option either.

Grrrr

its on the dropdown menu for me.

not a fan of the "upgrade" generally as yet, but giving it time. grumpy old man stuck in his ways, resistant to change. Me, not you.