Tips for Tikay

[exstream]

and hull to be relegated at 1.35
£900

[Ironside]

our SPL bet without Celtic is now basically a 2 horse race Aberdeen moved about rangers today both having played 21 games
Rangers are 4/6 aberdeen 6/5 we have £30 on aberdeen at 3/1

[Ant040689]

and hull to be relegated at 1.35
£900

Not to discredit the view, but do they not seem a little bit perky under the new manager for a small odds pop? Boro may be an interesting one at around 3/1, as Karanka looks more and more abject in interviews and the team performances imo have been dire. I do understand by the looks of how it is shaping up down there that Hull are in prime position to go down. But I look at how abject Palace and Boro have been.

Palace is very worrying. It is fair enough to get the results we have while looking perky, like we have a fight and only narrowly missing out on games, but we are lacking that fire for the battle. Even though in the game against Everton a draw would have been a fair result, it would have been done in an uninspiring 0-0 with very few chances.

It's like i am holding my breath for Allardyce to get that first league win and then judge him from there on in as the mental weight of that result would alleviate things somewhat to then see what he is really about but I am pretty shocked by how little impact he has had thus far. I really hope that changes and despite some big names in our squad i think there is a toxicity in the playing staff where they don't want it enough. Townsend the prime example of that. Zaha could be the spark though, in particular not against the top 8 teams as he seems to go missing when we play them. I'm undecided on Palace for relegation. At the odds I like Boro though.

[TightEnd]

Worth taking the 1/2 Seville now v Leicester to qualify with them getting beat in the FA cup.  Recommend £400 at 1/2 for fred if we can get on.

we don't have £400 spare in the few places we can get on, sorry. not dissing the bet, just can't tie up £400 for a month without depositing

[TightEnd]

and hull to be relegated at 1.35
£900

sorry you have to be 18 years old to bet

You must be 14 years old? 15?

[TightEnd]

1st April is one of our big days

Click to see full-size image.

[TightEnd]

apart from OutSam at Doncaster in the skybet

its a tremendous card of Cheltenham festival trials today

anyone got anything?

http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/cheltenham

[Tonibell]

The Cross  Country (no, wait!) has a 13/8 fav and 10 runners with two rags over 50s on the machine. So it doesn't take a genius to back the second in but I quite like* Auvergnat's last run at Punchestown and the easier course today will suit. 5/1 in quite a few places (quarter first three b365 if you can), 5.75 exchange.
http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/cheltenham/14:50/winner

*Subject to the usual caveats when playing the JP cap colour lottery.

[Marky147]

apart from OutSam at Doncaster in the skybet

its a tremendous card of Cheltenham festival trials today

anyone got anything?

http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/cheltenham

Not for now, but for the antepost book.

How about £50 @ 6/1 with Billys or everyday Charli Parcs any race.

Beat Master Blueyes easily, when giving it 5lbs, who then came out and finished a neck down to what is a well thought of 7 Brandys horse.

That pair were over 20 lengths clear of the others that day, so this Charli Parcs looks to be some animal.

Barry has chosen CP, even though Defi De Seuil is already rated 155.

CP is 12/1 for the Supreme, and 8/1 for the Triumph, hence preferring the any race market.

Forgot link - http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/racing-specials/cheltenham-festival/to-win-at-the-festival/to-win-at-the-festival

[TightEnd]

The Cross  Country (no, wait!) has a 13/8 fav and 10 runners with two rags over 50s on the machine. So it doesn't take a genius to back the second in but I quite like* Auvergnat's last run at Punchestown and the easier course today will suit. 5/1 in quite a few places (quarter first three b365 if you can), 5.75 exchange.
http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/cheltenham/14:50/winner

*Subject to the usual caveats when playing the JP cap colour lottery.

if engy and his TfT bet365 float sees this

we need 1/4 1,2,3

most places are 1/5

£25 e/w 5-1 bet365 please?

[TightEnd]

apart from OutSam at Doncaster in the skybet

its a tremendous card of Cheltenham festival trials today

anyone got anything?

http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/cheltenham

Not for now, but for the antepost book.

How about £50 @ 6/1 with Billys or everyday Charli Parcs any race.

Beat Master Blueyes easily, when giving it 5lbs, who then came out and finished a neck down to what is a well thought of 7 Brandys horse.

That pair were over 20 lengths clear of the others that day, so this Charli Parcs looks to be some animal.

Barry has chosen CP, even though Defi De Seuil is already rated 155.

CP is 12/1 for the Supreme, and 8/1 for the Triumph, hence preferring the any race market.

Forgot link - http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/racing-specials/cheltenham-festival/to-win-at-the-festival/to-win-at-the-festival

does it matter that it is now not running today?

[Marky147]

apart from OutSam at Doncaster in the skybet

its a tremendous card of Cheltenham festival trials today

anyone got anything?

http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/cheltenham

Not for now, but for the antepost book.

How about £50 @ 6/1 with Billys or everyday Charli Parcs any race.

Beat Master Blueyes easily, when giving it 5lbs, who then came out and finished a neck down to what is a well thought of 7 Brandys horse.

That pair were over 20 lengths clear of the others that day, so this Charli Parcs looks to be some animal.

Barry has chosen CP, even though Defi De Seuil is already rated 155.

CP is 12/1 for the Supreme, and 8/1 for the Triumph, hence preferring the any race market.

Forgot link - http://www.oddschecker.com/horse-racing/racing-specials/cheltenham-festival/to-win-at-the-festival/to-win-at-the-festival

does it matter that it is now not running today?

Ignore that now, as Billy has just gone NRNB*

*Money back as freebet up to £25 if target switches, and stake back if it misses festival.

[bergeroo]

Wrestling*

I asked my wrestling fan mate who would win the Royal Rumble. He has been quite good in predicting previously.

I will quote him below.

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/wwe/wwe-30-man-royal-rumble-match/winner

"Ok so the Rumble:

It is the most unpredictable ever.

 There have been SEVEN different favourites since the betting markets opened.

Undertaker-Goldberg-Rollins-Samoa Joe-Strowman-Lesnar and now Randy Orton.

Lesnar vs Goldberg is a lock for Wrestlemania.  It is very unlikely that the World Title would be involved given that they wrestle less than 6 matches a year.

Rollins vs Triple H is also a lock for Mania.  Again, there is no reason why that would be for a world title.

Samoa Joe and Strowman are absolutely laughable picks.

The only two that make any sense are The Undertaker and Randy Orton.

The Undertaker was favourit after Meltzer (who is the person responsible for moving the odds) said Vince was finally going to do Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania.  Cena is fighting AJ Styles for one of the World Titles at the Rumble.
A week later Meltzer said Vince had changed his mind.

 So Taker's odds moved out again to 4/1

Randy Orton is the favourite going in because on Thursday Metlzer said that they want to do Orton vs Bray Wyatt for one of the titles at Mania, and Wyatt will win one of the titles at the Feb PPV.

But Randy winning makes zero sense to me.  He has won a Rumble before, he's done everything in wrestling, he's a made man household name, he doesn't need to win the Rumble.

So for 20/1 odds, I'm wagering that Meltzer is correct about Orton vs Wyatt, but that his scenario is the wrong ray round - Wyatt will win the Rumble and Orton will win a title at the Feb PPV.

There is no value on Orton at 4/5.  So I have gone on Wyatt at 20/1.  I'm not going to do it myself but I'd advise hedging with The Undertaker at 4/1."

*Wrestling isn't real.

[tikay]

Wrestling*

I asked my wrestling fan mate who would win the Royal Rumble. He has been quite good in predicting previously.

I will quote him below.

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/wwe/wwe-30-man-royal-rumble-match/winner

"Ok so the Rumble:

It is the most unpredictable ever.

 There have been SEVEN different favourites since the betting markets opened.

Undertaker-Goldberg-Rollins-Samoa Joe-Strowman-Lesnar and now Randy Orton.

Lesnar vs Goldberg is a lock for Wrestlemania.  It is very unlikely that the World Title would be involved given that they wrestle less than 6 matches a year.

Rollins vs Triple H is also a lock for Mania.  Again, there is no reason why that would be for a world title.

Samoa Joe and Strowman are absolutely laughable picks.

The only two that make any sense are The Undertaker and Randy Orton.

The Undertaker was favourit after Meltzer (who is the person responsible for moving the odds) said Vince was finally going to do Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania.  Cena is fighting AJ Styles for one of the World Titles at the Rumble.
A week later Meltzer said Vince had changed his mind.

 So Taker's odds moved out again to 4/1

Randy Orton is the favourite going in because on Thursday Metlzer said that they want to do Orton vs Bray Wyatt for one of the titles at Mania, and Wyatt will win one of the titles at the Feb PPV.

But Randy winning makes zero sense to me.  He has won a Rumble before, he's done everything in wrestling, he's a made man household name, he doesn't need to win the Rumble.

So for 20/1 odds, I'm wagering that Meltzer is correct about Orton vs Wyatt, but that his scenario is the wrong ray round - Wyatt will win the Rumble and Orton will win a title at the Feb PPV.

There is no value on Orton at 4/5.  So I have gone on Wyatt at 20/1.  I'm not going to do it myself but I'd advise hedging with The Undertaker at 4/1."

*Wrestling isn't real.

Ha, I just read that last line.

[booder]

Wrestling*

I asked my wrestling fan mate who would win the Royal Rumble. He has been quite good in predicting previously.

I will quote him below.

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/wwe/wwe-30-man-royal-rumble-match/winner

"Ok so the Rumble:

It is the most unpredictable ever.

 There have been SEVEN different favourites since the betting markets opened.

Undertaker-Goldberg-Rollins-Samoa Joe-Strowman-Lesnar and now Randy Orton.

Lesnar vs Goldberg is a lock for Wrestlemania.  It is very unlikely that the World Title would be involved given that they wrestle less than 6 matches a year.

Rollins vs Triple H is also a lock for Mania.  Again, there is no reason why that would be for a world title.

Samoa Joe and Strowman are absolutely laughable picks.

The only two that make any sense are The Undertaker and Randy Orton.

The Undertaker was favourit after Meltzer (who is the person responsible for moving the odds) said Vince was finally going to do Cena vs Taker at Wrestlemania.  Cena is fighting AJ Styles for one of the World Titles at the Rumble.
A week later Meltzer said Vince had changed his mind.

 So Taker's odds moved out again to 4/1

Randy Orton is the favourite going in because on Thursday Metlzer said that they want to do Orton vs Bray Wyatt for one of the titles at Mania, and Wyatt will win one of the titles at the Feb PPV.

But Randy winning makes zero sense to me.  He has won a Rumble before, he's done everything in wrestling, he's a made man household name, he doesn't need to win the Rumble.

So for 20/1 odds, I'm wagering that Meltzer is correct about Orton vs Wyatt, but that his scenario is the wrong ray round - Wyatt will win the Rumble and Orton will win a title at the Feb PPV.

There is no value on Orton at 4/5.  So I have gone on Wyatt at 20/1.  I'm not going to do it myself but I'd advise hedging with The Undertaker at 4/1."

*Wrestling isn't real.

Don't tell Snoopy.