blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 25, 2024, 03:40:39 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272583 Posts in 66754 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  Tips for Tikay
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9040 9041 9042 9043 [9044] 9045 9046 9047 9048 ... 9208 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Tips for Tikay  (Read 13429825 times)
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7056


View Profile
« Reply #135645 on: April 05, 2019, 01:43:10 PM »

I grabbed a sample of 20k flat turf runners - 1083 races all 16+ runner handicaps.  I thought that the amended terms would generally be worse for punters, but that isn't really the case.

First the actual place return if backing all 20k horses at SP

1/4 4 19336
1/5 5 20850
1/6 6 22479
1/7 7 24007

obviously this sample has some 16 runner races, so 1/7, 7 places in those cases is not really something that would be offered very often.....

The return of stake when a horse places is the main advantage - 1/3 odds 3 places only returns 17629!  When you consider though that the less places bet is actually getting "nearer" to a win bet with a huge book %*, it makes sense.

I theorised that more places meant that the edge moved from shorter priced horses to longer ones, but again that isn't the case

less than 10-1 shots 4334 runners place

1/4 4 etc
4373
4645
4792
4906

So once again the return improves even with short prices.

*The win return at SP is a horrific 12865 for 20k staked!  So the most important lesson from all this is, simply take the best early price you can get.


Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16576


View Profile
« Reply #135646 on: April 05, 2019, 02:03:09 PM »

I grabbed a sample of 20k flat turf runners - 1083 races all 16+ runner handicaps.  I thought that the amended terms would generally be worse for punters, but that isn't really the case.

First the actual place return if backing all 20k horses at SP

1/4 4 19336
1/5 5 20850
1/6 6 22479
1/7 7 24007

obviously this sample has some 16 runner races, so 1/7, 7 places in those cases is not really something that would be offered very often.....

The return of stake when a horse places is the main advantage - 1/3 odds 3 places only returns 17629!  When you consider though that the less places bet is actually getting "nearer" to a win bet with a huge book %*, it makes sense.

I theorised that more places meant that the edge moved from shorter priced horses to longer ones, but again that isn't the case

less than 10-1 shots 4334 runners place

1/4 4 etc
4373
4645
4792
4906

So once again the return improves even with short prices.

*The win return at SP is a horrific 12865 for 20k staked!  So the most important lesson from all this is, simply take the best early price you can get.




I have redone the maths, and think I must have been wrong when I did them originally, or maybe I was looking at something like 10 quarter first 4 or 9/1 fifth first 5. Either way I was wrong.

A quarter first 4 and a fifth first 5 are pretty much the same, and a seventh first 7 is a bit better (assuming a correctly priced 10/1 chance in a 20 runner race).  The differences are small (circa .7% difference between quarter first 4 and a fifth first 5, and 3% between a seventh first 7 and quarter first 4)

So the lesson is that the price is by far the most important thing, and Geoff Banks has been unfairly criticised for his seventh first 7 offer.  There are better prices around and better offers around (such as a quarter first 5 (365) and a fifth first 6 (ladbrokes, hills and paddy power).  If you have a really long one, close to betfair, Geoff Banks is ok.  If he'll lay you a bet anyway.
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #135647 on: April 05, 2019, 02:36:42 PM »


^^^^^^


"....A quarter first 4 and a fifth first 5 are pretty much the same..."

So, unless I'm misunderstanding the debate, why do so many say fifth first 5 is a lot worse than quarter first 4?
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
horseplayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10601



View Profile
« Reply #135648 on: April 05, 2019, 02:39:19 PM »

Really like Min today 10/3 seems more than fair, think the last day can be ignored and Walsh riding well again

had a small bet
Logged
BigAdz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8152



View Profile
« Reply #135649 on: April 05, 2019, 02:43:16 PM »

Really like Min today 10/3 seems more than fair, think the last day can be ignored and Walsh riding well again

had a small bet


LOL..just LOL


Just to try and prove a point eh.
Logged

Good evenink. I wish I had a girlfriend.......
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7056


View Profile
« Reply #135650 on: April 05, 2019, 02:46:07 PM »


^^^^^^


"....A quarter first 4 and a fifth first 5 are pretty much the same..."

So, unless I'm misunderstanding the debate, why do so many say fifth first 5 is a lot worse than quarter first 4?

they should probably consider if they would like to be offered 1/40 first 40 in the GN
Logged
RobS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 502



View Profile
« Reply #135651 on: April 05, 2019, 02:50:27 PM »

I grabbed a sample of 20k flat turf runners - 1083 races all 16+ runner handicaps.  I thought that the amended terms would generally be worse for punters, but that isn't really the case.

First the actual place return if backing all 20k horses at SP

1/4 4 19336
1/5 5 20850
1/6 6 22479
1/7 7 24007

obviously this sample has some 16 runner races, so 1/7, 7 places in those cases is not really something that would be offered very often.....

The return of stake when a horse places is the main advantage - 1/3 odds 3 places only returns 17629!  When you consider though that the less places bet is actually getting "nearer" to a win bet with a huge book %*, it makes sense.

I theorised that more places meant that the edge moved from shorter priced horses to longer ones, but again that isn't the case

less than 10-1 shots 4334 runners place

1/4 4 etc
4373
4645
4792
4906

So once again the return improves even with short prices.

*The win return at SP is a horrific 12865 for 20k staked!  So the most important lesson from all this is, simply take the best early price you can get


Thanks for posting this, brilliant research.
Always been confident that 1/4 4 is not better than 1/5 5 in general.

Just goes to show that those that write with the most confidence or authority can actually be wrong sometimes.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2019, 02:52:23 PM by RobS » Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16576


View Profile
« Reply #135652 on: April 05, 2019, 02:59:51 PM »


^^^^^^


"....A quarter first 4 and a fifth first 5 are pretty much the same..."

So, unless I'm misunderstanding the debate, why do so many say fifth first 5 is a lot worse than quarter first 4?

I don't know.   As I said I did some maths a few months ago and must have cocked up.  I can't speak for anyone else. 

Everyone makes mistakes, and I make more as I get older.  Nothing new there. 
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
horseplayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10601



View Profile
« Reply #135653 on: April 05, 2019, 03:22:02 PM »

We have the value here with Min anyway all we can do
Logged
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13285


View Profile
« Reply #135654 on: April 05, 2019, 03:26:30 PM »

We have the value here with Min anyway all we can do

cheers John.  Different class as usual. 
Logged
Chompy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11852


Expert


View Profile
« Reply #135655 on: April 05, 2019, 03:26:38 PM »

Great stuff, win or lose horsey, top bombing.
Logged

"I know we must all worship at the Church of Chomps, but statements like this are just plain ridic. He says he can't get a bet on, but we all know he can."
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13285


View Profile
« Reply #135656 on: April 05, 2019, 03:31:07 PM »

https://twitter.com/racingblogger/status/1114172350923247617

blogger knew as well must have been where tthe money come from.  Not Horsey!
Logged
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13285


View Profile
« Reply #135657 on: April 05, 2019, 03:31:56 PM »

fuck me john i could have ridden that home never mind a bad out of form Rubyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Logged
Chompy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11852


Expert


View Profile
« Reply #135658 on: April 05, 2019, 03:32:16 PM »

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

Given an absolute peach by a jockey at the top of his game. He is so good round here.

TWENTY lengths, hard on the snaff. Beautifully presented at every fence.

Top work JB.
Logged

"I know we must all worship at the Church of Chomps, but statements like this are just plain ridic. He says he can't get a bet on, but we all know he can."
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16576


View Profile
« Reply #135659 on: April 05, 2019, 03:32:32 PM »

Great stuff John.  
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Pages: 1 ... 9040 9041 9042 9043 [9044] 9045 9046 9047 9048 ... 9208 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.169 seconds with 20 queries.