blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 26, 2025, 09:35:44 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262448 Posts in 66607 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  Tips for Tikay
0 Members and 48 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6095 6096 6097 6098 [6099] 6100 6101 6102 6103 ... 9209 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Tips for Tikay  (Read 16490042 times)
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16733


View Profile
« Reply #91470 on: November 30, 2014, 01:06:59 PM »

Here here, Tighty. I'm convinced Sir Bruce kept these nefarious fripperies out of the show. Jumping the shark is a spot on description.

I suspect the top of the leader board market is getting less attractive now, as there's nothing really between the top five week on week and ties are very likely.

Best of luck in the four card stuff.

I don't know the answer to this, but are ties inherently bad?

If we are making an EV bet then I don't see much difference between putting a tenner on Pixie on a bet that only pays £20 or loses £10 and one that sometimes pays you a fiver too?  I can see how you end up with less +£20s if there are more ties, but you also end up with less -£10s too. 

I am not saying that weekly betting is good, just that I don't see the number of dead heats having much to do with it.  It feels like a secondary effect that can't make a lot of difference to me.  I'd far rather give up because we have 5 good couples with not much between them and only 3 bookies laying to 120% or similar.

Anybody know for sure?
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Marky147
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22634



View Profile
« Reply #91471 on: November 30, 2014, 01:18:09 PM »

Does the X Factor elimination still go to the judges tonight?

If so, do we think they'll kick out Lauren ahead of Stereo Dicks?

Lauren is 1-4 to be in the bottom two, Stereo Dicks are 1-2. Not sure I'd have them as far apart as 2-5, 9-2 for the boot. Stereo Dicks are, ultimately, awful.

Judges love the Stereo Kicks...

The comments from the judges generally bear no relevance to the performance, and it's like they're just reading off one of those call centre sheets Cheesy

Pretty certain  the judges will take it to the public from now on for the bottom two. Seems to be that two of the judges gush about whatever act is on.

They have done most weeks, bar when they got rid of Stevi, and that has still resulted in the betting favourite going home.

I tried being clever when Jay James was odds on to go, and backed Stevi at 5/1. I was counting when Louis and Simon saved Jay, only to see Mel B send it to deadlock, despite the fact she spent every week moaning about him.



Don't think it is a two horse race for bottom 2.  Andrea isn't very popular any more.   And I can see simon taking stereo kicks over Andrea.  Cheryl unlikely to be off script if that is the case.  Was hoping for better than 5/1 mind, so no bet. 

That's a given, Simon doesn't like Andrea, and he thinks that Stereo Kicks can make him money.

I'm just saying that the market hasn't been wrong yet, even when it looked absurd.
Logged

Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #91472 on: November 30, 2014, 02:11:28 PM »

Here here, Tighty. I'm convinced Sir Bruce kept these nefarious fripperies out of the show. Jumping the shark is a spot on description.

I suspect the top of the leader board market is getting less attractive now, as there's nothing really between the top five week on week and ties are very likely.

Best of luck in the four card stuff.

I don't know the answer to this, but are ties inherently bad?

If we are making an EV bet then I don't see much difference between putting a tenner on Pixie on a bet that only pays £20 or loses £10 and one that sometimes pays you a fiver too?  I can see how you end up with less +£20s if there are more ties, but you also end up with less -£10s too. 

I am not saying that weekly betting is good, just that I don't see the number of dead heats having much to do with it.  It feels like a secondary effect that can't make a lot of difference to me.  I'd far rather give up because we have 5 good couples with not much between them and only 3 bookies laying to 120% or similar.

Anybody know for sure?

Personally, I've got more chances of finding value in the judges' scores than the public view.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13270


View Profile
« Reply #91473 on: November 30, 2014, 02:16:18 PM »

NFL

I have had a max bet on a double at hills ante post.  Spoke about this earlier in the week.  Think fred got enough Eagles positions already so Tighty wasn't keen to get deeper involved which is fair enough.

Eagles 4/9 and Arizona evens.

Both these prices are too big and probably liab driven at this stage of the season.  Eagles should be closer to 1/4 (spreads have them as likely as GB to win their division yet Eagles are 4/9 (people asking for 2/5 on bf for chunks) and GB generally 2/7 (1/3 in a place).  

Arizona is a virtual 2 horse race with Seattle (assume hills are also full of Seattle like dallas) and happy to 'give it away'.  The key in this div is SF.  I am struggling to see how they are a single figure price to win this division.  They are miles behind, have no tie breakers yet take out >10% of the book with most firms.  The spreads also have Arizona as a decent fav when most firms have it as a coin flip.  Happy to go with sportingindex spreadsheets over the lol liability driven 'give it away' hills traders.

Recommend £100 double at hills at 15/8.  Appreciate fred won't want to get on but the post is more for others to get on.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2014, 02:23:16 PM by arbboy » Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #91474 on: November 30, 2014, 02:30:11 PM »

Any views out there on the Packers Patriots game? I'm Thinking unders on the points total with both teams running the ball quite a bit and throwing a lot of check downs killing time on the clock...

Everyone has been trying to get a piece of NE/GB, as the total opened at 60 in some shops before settling around 57-58

http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl/new-england-patriots-at-green-bay-packers/total-points

– the opening 60 was the highest over/under since the Greatest Show on Turf Rams played the 49ers in 2000 (63 over/under)

the Patriots will probably go with a power running game, try to keep rodgers off the field and control the clock away from home

Although it has been a recipe for disaster in a lot nfl primtetime games this season, quotes up here almost compel you to try the under
« Last Edit: November 30, 2014, 02:32:10 PM by TightEnd » Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
bobby1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9573



View Profile
« Reply #91475 on: November 30, 2014, 02:42:08 PM »

Think that's the 5th time in a couple of weeks I've read summat on an NFL game that's just a quote taken from a preview elsewhere. I know it doesn't really matter but surely we have to link the article(s) instead of just passing it as an opinion?


4:25PM ET Game

New England @ Green Bay

'''''Sunday's Patriots-Packers showdown has a week-high 58.5-point over-under that feels like a bit of a trap. I don't see Aaron Rodgers lighting up Darrelle Revis and Brandon Browner, and it's entirely possible New England attacks Green Bay with a power-rushing attack, slowing down the game. I'd bet the under.'''''
Logged

“The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.”
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #91476 on: November 30, 2014, 02:44:09 PM »

I use rotoworld for the stats quite a lot, just a short cut for a quick post where i add an opinion at the end but i don't think the quote you put up is from there, must be a different article
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
bobby1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9573



View Profile
« Reply #91477 on: November 30, 2014, 03:09:01 PM »

I use rotoworld for the stats quite a lot, just a short cut for a quick post where i add an opinion at the end but i don't think the quote you put up is from there, must be a different article

np, tho It is from Rotoworld.
Logged

“The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.”
Stopsleyhatter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 393


View Profile
« Reply #91478 on: November 30, 2014, 03:20:22 PM »

Any views out there on the Packers Patriots game? I'm Thinking unders on the points total with both teams running the ball quite a bit and throwing a lot of check downs killing time on the clock...

Everyone has been trying to get a piece of NE/GB, as the total opened at 60 in some shops before settling around 57-58

http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl/new-england-patriots-at-green-bay-packers/total-points

– the opening 60 was the highest over/under since the Greatest Show on Turf Rams played the 49ers in 2000 (63 over/under)

the Patriots will probably go with a power running game, try to keep rodgers off the field and control the clock away from home

Although it has been a recipe for disaster in a lot nfl primtetime games this season, quotes up here almost compel you to try the under
£30 on the unders for the thread?
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #91479 on: November 30, 2014, 03:39:33 PM »

there was an interesting player prop too

this guy is a writer for nfl network

"Albert Breer ‏@AlbertBreer

Browns had Josh Gordon on a pitch count last week. He exceeded expectations. I'm told the reins come off today. He's full go vs. Bills."


last week was against Atlanta, a poor secondary and Gordon did the following

http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/15705/josh-gordon


so if 8 catches was on restricted duty, what does "full go" mean? try and get it to him 15 times?

over his career (last year was a break out year) he's a big play guy, around 17 yards per reception. Again from the espn link above

the spreads are around 85 yards

http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl/cleveland-browns-at-buffalo-bills/total-receiving-yds-josh-gordon


the team passing defense stats are on http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?seasonType=REG&offensiveStatisticCategory=TEAM_PASSING&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=PASSING_NET_YARDS_GAME_AVG&tabSeq=2&season=2014&role=OPP&Submit=Go&archive=false&con

Atlanta is 32 of 32 so last week's line of 8-120 is flattered by that

Buffalo is a different prospect, top ten passing defense and very stout up front so its not too easy to run on them.

if you look at their secondary as i typically do i go to our lads

http://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/BUF

mckelvin is the number one corner, out for the year so its gordon versus gilmore or one of the replacements. have to assume the browns OL wil stand up in protection but i like the match up for overs here

 
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #91480 on: November 30, 2014, 03:58:55 PM »

How's Cleveland against the pass rush? The Bills are really finding some ground there now, after a slow start.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #91481 on: November 30, 2014, 04:53:56 PM »

How's Cleveland against the pass rush? The Bills are really finding some ground there now, after a slow start.

one of the better ones

conceded 18 sacks this season

offense is 12th in passing yards. obviously first ten weeks without gordon

http://www.nfl.com/teams/clevelandbrowns/statistics?team=CLE

pro bowl left tackle in joe thomas

buffalo is a strong front 7 though
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #91482 on: November 30, 2014, 05:07:34 PM »

I know we should be wary of recency biased overs, but Big Ben passing yards against the saints looks juicy.

(Steelers Media Manager) Dom Rinelli @drinelli

Most Passing Yards Per Home Game: Single-Season NFL History
Ben Roethlisberger 361.2 (2014)
Tony Romo 355.1 (2012)
Drew Brees 354.4 (2013)

New Orleans are poor against the pass, having improved against the run. They're in a division which flatters the stats a little, with Cam inconsistent and the Falcons having no OL.Can see Bell getting screen passes and the wideouts having fun in the deep. Line 290.5 with BadBlokes.

Thoughts?
« Last Edit: November 30, 2014, 05:09:08 PM by Tal » Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #91483 on: November 30, 2014, 05:27:53 PM »

I know we should be wary of recency biased overs, but Big Ben passing yards against the saints looks juicy.

(Steelers Media Manager) Dom Rinelli @drinelli

Most Passing Yards Per Home Game: Single-Season NFL History
Ben Roethlisberger 361.2 (2014)
Tony Romo 355.1 (2012)
Drew Brees 354.4 (2013)

New Orleans are poor against the pass, having improved against the run. They're in a division which flatters the stats a little, with Cam inconsistent and the Falcons having no OL.Can see Bell getting screen passes and the wideouts having fun in the deep. Line 290.5 with BadBlokes.

Thoughts?


Wouldn't disagree

on the saints, there are various bits and peices out today that are interesting

Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet now18 minutes ago

Drew Brees is 35 years old & #Saints have seen arm strength wane. He’s not big like Brady or Manning. #Saints must be prepared for the end

Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet now20 minutes ago

Given Brees’ struggles, #Saints are preparing for life after Brees. Expect them to draft a QB high this draft. They wish they did last year

which helps explain some fantasy league dramas i have had in various leagues this year
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #91484 on: November 30, 2014, 05:30:54 PM »

£33 for £30, Tighty?

(Or whatever the shouty red man will lay?)
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Pages: 1 ... 6095 6096 6097 6098 [6099] 6100 6101 6102 6103 ... 9209 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.505 seconds with 20 queries.