|
TightEnd
|
 |
« Reply #115875 on: April 07, 2016, 03:21:02 PM » |
|
Apples Jade 14/1 for the 2017 champion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
Karabiner
|
|
« Reply #115876 on: April 07, 2016, 03:24:51 PM » |
|
Apples Jade 14/1 for the 2017 champion.
It's very tough for 4-y-o hurdlers when they step up the following season. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
|
|
|
|
Rod Paradise
|
|
« Reply #115877 on: April 07, 2016, 03:42:13 PM » |
|
National Over rounds
2015 164.9
2014 150.8
2013 147.8
2012 152.2
2011 154.7
I'm learning plenty on this thread & muddle through when I can but I need to ask - What's that mean? The "over-round" is the bookmakers profit as a %age. So 164 means a theoretical profit of 64% on a perfectly balanced book (ie every horse backed to take out the same amount). The key point Rod is never just put the horse's name on a big race betting slip as you will get the starting price (SP) which will be the worst odds possible*, always take an early price, preferably online. *(ceteris paribus) Cheers guys, the thread's an education (at some point I'll have worked out all the nicknames for the online bookies as well  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
May the bird of paradise fly up your nose, with a badger on its back.
|
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #115878 on: April 07, 2016, 03:51:32 PM » |
|
What a superb animal
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BigAdz
|
|
« Reply #115879 on: April 07, 2016, 03:52:04 PM » |
|
Wow. I wanted CC beat, but I think based on that he would have won the GC.
Another day, another place, but that was impressive enough to convince me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Good evenink. I wish I had a girlfriend.......
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #115880 on: April 07, 2016, 03:53:59 PM » |
|
Wow. I wanted CC beat, but I think based on that he would have won the GC.
Another day, another place, but that was impressive enough to convince me
Not a chance he would have won at Cheltenham, didn't you listen to anything Aaron had to say Yeah, his record at Aintree nothing like Cheltenham. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #115881 on: April 07, 2016, 03:56:19 PM » |
|
Even more amazing really were his achievements ie winning the bumper when not able to breathe properly
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #115882 on: April 07, 2016, 03:59:58 PM » |
|
National Over rounds
2015 164.9
2014 150.8
2013 147.8
2012 152.2
2011 154.7
I'm learning plenty on this thread & muddle through when I can but I need to ask - What's that mean? The "over-round" is the bookmakers profit as a %age. So 164 means a theoretical profit of 64% on a perfectly balanced book (ie every horse backed to take out the same amount). The key point Rod is never just put the horse's name on a big race betting slip as you will get the starting price (SP) which will be the worst odds possible*, always take an early price, preferably online. *(ceteris paribus) Cheers guys, the thread's an education (at some point I'll have worked out all the nicknames for the online bookies as well ) The overround saga from last year was discussed by some idiot or other at the time: http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=65324.0(Contains nostalgia, women in bikinis, mild grumpage and a former TV poker commentator) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
|
BigAdz
|
|
« Reply #115883 on: April 07, 2016, 04:06:07 PM » |
|
NB. I clearly know more than Willie, Dom Poli ran a race that suggested the National would have been a better option.....  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Good evenink. I wish I had a girlfriend.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #115885 on: April 07, 2016, 04:19:06 PM » |
|
Just for clarification on the sp % maths. 161% book doesn't give a 61% profit margin for bookmakers. It assumes for every £161 invested (turnover) (perfectly balanced across all runners for assumption - never happens in reality) the bookmaker will pay out £100 of that and keep £61 for themselves (profit). Their profit margin therefore is 61/161 = 38% profit on turnover.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BigAdz
|
|
« Reply #115886 on: April 07, 2016, 05:08:53 PM » |
|
Should have kept Pendleton on PDP!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Good evenink. I wish I had a girlfriend.......
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #115887 on: April 07, 2016, 05:23:15 PM » |
|
All mid/wide both tracks Romf and Cray on bags this afternoon. Jolly fest at both tracks. Fav backers in clover today across horses and dogs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PokerBroker
|
|
« Reply #115888 on: April 07, 2016, 05:39:22 PM » |
|
It looks like there has been a bit of cash for Minella Present. I managed to nab some 7's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PokerBroker
|
|
« Reply #115889 on: April 07, 2016, 05:46:40 PM » |
|
That is why I seldom punt horses. Did it manage to beat anything home?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author