It's time for the author of the referendum to explain that respecting its outcome doesn’t have to mean disrespecting the fundamental importance of parliament, says James Kirkup
(link: https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/08/its-time-david-cameron-returned-to-fix-his-brexit-mess/)
(link: https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/08/its-time-david-cameron-returned-to-fix-his-brexit-mess/)
One man got to decide? But parliament decided they didn’t want the WA so who watches over them?
we get the chance at a GE to decide on who should form our parliament, at a constituency level and then in aggregate at party level
The referendum was advisory (never effectively marketed as such by the remain campaign of course, complacently), since when it has been treated as overwhelming gospel
We currently have a stand off between Parliamentary democracy and direct democracy but the former supercedes the latter.
We get a GE and elect those who profess to represent our interests
Opposition parties and all the current Brexit objectors didn’t honour their duties with their complacent, ineffectual representation pre-referendum
Then when presented with WA they once again failed to execute their duties of representation voting self interest, party interest instead
Now these same folk say it’s Boris’s Brexit and he’s failing to execute his duty to represent the interests of people and needs to be watched over.
In fact that collectively poor representation and subsequent division has ownership over Brexit imo, it is their Brexit