poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 04, 2025, 05:10:28 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262029
Posts in
66597
Topics by
16987
Members
Latest Member:
michael85
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
[
7
]
8
9
10
11
...
18
Author
Topic: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification! (Read 41909 times)
chrisbruce
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1353
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #90 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:46:02 PM »
I was under the impresion that when you enter a poker competition the casino has a "duty of care" to look after your interests in that competition. Having accepted your entry money as a player the casino is obliged to look after your interests. If subsequently you misbehave / abuse a dealer, and get banned then that is your fault and you lose your entry.
But in Ali's case the incident had happened before the competition started and should have been resolved prior to Ali starting this comp.
Legally I would love to know how this stacks up but would like to think that gambling laws are there to protect the player.
Logged
77dave
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4010
5 2 off
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #91 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:48:57 PM »
Quote from: chrisbruce on December 30, 2006, 10:46:02 PM
I was under the impresion that when you enter a poker competition the casino has a "duty of care" to look after your interests in that competition. Having accepted your entry money as a player the casino is obliged to look after your interests. If subsequently you misbehave / abuse a dealer, and get banned then that is your fault and you lose your entry.
But in Ali's case the incident had happened before the competition started and should have been resolved prior to Ali starting this comp.
Legally I would love to know how this stacks up but would like to think that gambling laws are there to protect the player.
Logged
Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #92 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:49:24 PM »
Quote from: Royal Flush on December 30, 2006, 10:41:03 PM
It was all a ploy to stop Tikay coming 9th
Rumbled.
I managed a brilliant 8th, & I outlasted Ali.........There's a first for me.
Logged
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link -
http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY
(copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
MadYank
Rezident Farang (Yank Flavour)
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 272
Sawat Di Khrap!
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #93 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:49:45 PM »
Quote from: RED-DOG on December 30, 2006, 10:43:44 PM
Quote from: ariston on December 30, 2006, 10:40:40 PM
the only people whos reputations have ever been questioned by me have had no reputation worth a toss imo.
That's funnier than what Flushie said.
This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.
That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of) before you ask)
Logged
www.madyankyakburger.blogspot.com
77dave
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4010
5 2 off
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #94 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:52:51 PM »
i wonder what ali thought the correct outcome would be
personally i think if i was in the final and spoke to ali outside after he was refused entree he would tell me to go on and play my best poker and to win the comp
Logged
Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
byronkincaid
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5024
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #95 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:53:48 PM »
i guess a lot of us have no idea who have the shady histories but please feel to PM me some stories:)
Logged
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6200
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #96 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:54:06 PM »
Quote from: RED-DOG on December 30, 2006, 10:36:39 PM
Quote from: tikay on December 30, 2006, 10:34:23 PM
Quote from: ariston on December 30, 2006, 10:12:29 PM
I do feel sorry for Steve on this as he is in a no win situation and is still relatively new in the job. awful position for him to be put in and totally out of his control. Taking ali out of the situation completely there is an argument for taking the chips out of play, dividing the chips equally between the other players or leaving them there and letting him ante away. The best way to solve it? I wouldn't know and wouldn't want to have to make the decision as there is no fair way to resolve the situation and whatever happens it will favour either the big stacks or the small stacks.
To make it even more difficult, Steve was not there this afternoon!
One has to feel some sympathy with Grosvenor, the whole thing is jolly difficult to resolve in a way that is fair to all.
It would have been much easier to resolve tomorrow.
I don't think one has to feel any sympathy for Grosvenor for precisely this reason - whilst I appreciate how much they add to poker in the country generally, this seems to be a situation which could have been quickly and easily resolved by letting Ali stay and finish the competition. If there isn't any process in place to implement this then that is a managerial and commercial mistake on Grosvenor's part which they should rectify to avoid a repeat of this situation.
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
thetank
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19278
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #97 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:54:43 PM »
Quote from: MadYank on December 30, 2006, 10:49:45 PM
This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.
That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of) before you ask)
I don't see the irony.
You can be prudently mindful of your own reputation, for there are many who will be quick to judge.
This shouldn't mean you now
have
to then judge others for their past discrepencies. You should still be free to ballyhoo whomever you wish.
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
ariston
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3762
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #98 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:56:05 PM »
Quote from: MadYank on December 30, 2006, 10:49:45 PM
Quote from: RED-DOG on December 30, 2006, 10:43:44 PM
Quote from: ariston on December 30, 2006, 10:40:40 PM
the only people whos reputations have ever been questioned by me have had no reputation worth a toss imo.
That's funnier than what Flushie said.
This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.
That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of) before you ask)
probably one for another thread that ron.
The comment flushy made was a joke but I will always take offence on that line, he has apologised and thats the end of it for me.
Logged
ariston
better lucky than good
MadYank
Rezident Farang (Yank Flavour)
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 272
Sawat Di Khrap!
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #99 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:58:25 PM »
Quote from: ariston on December 30, 2006, 10:56:05 PM
Quote from: MadYank on December 30, 2006, 10:49:45 PM
Quote from: RED-DOG on December 30, 2006, 10:43:44 PM
Quote from: ariston on December 30, 2006, 10:40:40 PM
the only people whos reputations have ever been questioned by me have had no reputation worth a toss imo.
That's funnier than what Flushie said.
This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.
That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of) before you ask)
probably one for another thread that ron.
The comment flushy made was a joke but I will always take offence on that line, he has apologised and thats the end of it for me.
What if I was to say "You're bald and chubby!" WOuld that be something you might take offence to?
Logged
www.madyankyakburger.blogspot.com
thetank
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19278
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #100 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:59:23 PM »
Quote from: thetank on December 30, 2006, 10:54:43 PM
I don't see the irony.
It's ok, I do now.
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
M3boy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5785
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #101 on:
December 30, 2006, 10:59:30 PM »
Not knowing the inns and outs - I am not commenting on what was "right" or "wrong"
BUT, knowing how much Ali spends in the Casino - if you dont believe me, watch him play roulette!! Then to Bar him MUST of been for something serious.
Then again, maybe it wasnt ?!?!
We will never know I suppose.
Nice bloke though Ali, have played many times with him. ALWAYS a gentleman.
Logged
ariston
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3762
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #102 on:
December 30, 2006, 11:00:26 PM »
how could i take offence to that ron? I would take it as a compliment as in fact I am both bald and a fat bastard so chubby is quite nice tyvm.
Logged
ariston
better lucky than good
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #103 on:
December 30, 2006, 11:00:55 PM »
Quote from: ariston on December 30, 2006, 10:56:05 PM
The comment flushy made was a joke but I will always take offence on that line, he has apologised and thats the end of it for me.
Thought i should say i apologised for causing offence to Russ rather than the joke itself, he asked me to take it down as it offended him, i think he is being over sensitive but he asked and i never meant to cause offence so took it down.
Integrity gate is seriously affecting the Ali vs Saddam count.
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
«
Reply #104 on:
December 30, 2006, 11:01:14 PM »
Quote from: chrisbruce on December 30, 2006, 10:46:02 PM
I was under the impresion that when you enter a poker competition the casino has a "duty of care" to look after your interests in that competition. Having accepted your entry money as a player the casino is obliged to look after your interests. If subsequently you misbehave / abuse a dealer, and get banned then that is your fault and you lose your entry.
But in Ali's case the incident had happened before the competition started and should have been resolved prior to Ali starting this comp.
Legally I would love to know how this stacks up but would like to think that gambling laws are there to protect the player.
Choosing my words with some care here,
it's my understanding
that Ali feels he has a case to take to the GC, & he wil be consulting solicitors if Grosvenor do not satisfy him. He thinks they have no right to, in effect, "confinscate" his chips.
I hope they get round a table & sort this out. Ali spends a fortune in Grosvenor, & Grosvenor know this. Unless he's committed a heinous sin (& I hope he has not) common sense should prevail. Of course, if Ali has been naughty, well, to be fair, he must pay his bill.
Logged
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link -
http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY
(copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
[
7
]
8
9
10
11
...
18
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...