blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 04, 2025, 05:10:28 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262029 Posts in 66597 Topics by 16987 Members
Latest Member: michael85
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 ... 18 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Sensation at the Sandcastle - Blackpool Disqualification!  (Read 41909 times)
chrisbruce
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1353



View Profile
« Reply #90 on: December 30, 2006, 10:46:02 PM »

I was under the impresion that when you enter a poker competition the casino has a "duty of care" to look after your interests in that competition. Having accepted your entry money as a player the casino is obliged to look after your interests. If subsequently you misbehave  / abuse a dealer, and get banned then that is your fault and you lose your entry.
 But in Ali's case the incident had happened before the competition started and should have been resolved prior to Ali starting this comp.

Legally I would love to know how this stacks up but would like to think that gambling laws are there to protect the player.
Logged
77dave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010


5 2 off


View Profile WWW
« Reply #91 on: December 30, 2006, 10:48:57 PM »

I was under the impresion that when you enter a poker competition the casino has a "duty of care" to look after your interests in that competition. Having accepted your entry money as a player the casino is obliged to look after your interests. If subsequently you misbehave  / abuse a dealer, and get banned then that is your fault and you lose your entry.
 But in Ali's case the incident had happened before the competition started and should have been resolved prior to Ali starting this comp.

Legally I would love to know how this stacks up but would like to think that gambling laws are there to protect the player.

 
Logged

Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #92 on: December 30, 2006, 10:49:24 PM »

It was all a ploy to stop Tikay coming 9th

Rumbled.

I managed a brilliant 8th, & I outlasted Ali.........There's a first for me.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
MadYank
Rezident Farang (Yank Flavour)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 272


Sawat Di Khrap!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #93 on: December 30, 2006, 10:49:45 PM »



the only people whos reputations have ever been questioned by me have had no reputation worth a toss imo.

That's funnier than what Flushie said. 

This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.

That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of)  before you ask)
Logged

77dave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010


5 2 off


View Profile WWW
« Reply #94 on: December 30, 2006, 10:52:51 PM »

i wonder what ali thought the correct outcome would be

personally i think if i was in the final and spoke to ali outside after he was refused entree  he would tell me to go on and play my best poker and to win the comp
Logged

Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
byronkincaid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5024



View Profile
« Reply #95 on: December 30, 2006, 10:53:48 PM »

i guess a lot of us have no idea who have the shady histories but please feel to PM me some stories:)
Logged
Jon MW
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6200



View Profile
« Reply #96 on: December 30, 2006, 10:54:06 PM »

I do feel sorry for Steve on this as he is in a no win situation and is still relatively new in the job. awful position for him to be put in and totally out of his control. Taking ali out of the situation completely there is an argument for taking the chips out of play, dividing the chips equally between the other players or leaving them there and letting him ante away. The best way to solve it? I wouldn't know and wouldn't want to have to make the decision as there is no fair way to resolve the situation and whatever happens it will favour either the big stacks or the small stacks.

To make it even more difficult, Steve was not there this afternoon!

One has to feel some sympathy with Grosvenor, the whole thing is jolly difficult to resolve in a way that is fair to all.

It would have been much easier to resolve tomorrow.

I don't think one has to feel any sympathy for Grosvenor for precisely this reason - whilst I appreciate how much they add to poker in the country generally, this seems to be a situation which could have been quickly and easily resolved by letting Ali stay and finish the competition. If there isn't any process in place to implement this then that is a managerial and commercial mistake on Grosvenor's part which they should rectify to avoid a repeat of this situation.
Logged

Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield

2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain  - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #97 on: December 30, 2006, 10:54:43 PM »


This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.

That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of)  before you ask)


I don't see the irony.

You can be prudently mindful of your own reputation, for there are many who will be quick to judge.

This shouldn't mean you now have to then judge others for their past discrepencies. You should still be free to ballyhoo whomever you wish.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
ariston
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3762


View Profile
« Reply #98 on: December 30, 2006, 10:56:05 PM »



the only people whos reputations have ever been questioned by me have had no reputation worth a toss imo.

That's funnier than what Flushie said. 

This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.

That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of)  before you ask)

probably one for another thread that ron.

The comment flushy made was a joke but I will always take offence on that line, he has apologised and thats the end of it for me.
Logged

ariston

better lucky than good
MadYank
Rezident Farang (Yank Flavour)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 272


Sawat Di Khrap!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #99 on: December 30, 2006, 10:58:25 PM »



the only people whos reputations have ever been questioned by me have had no reputation worth a toss imo.

That's funnier than what Flushie said. 

This whole reputation thing is a bit weird. I FULLY understand that any serious player should be highly protective of his integrity/reputaion within the community and Aiston is well in the right to take offense if his rep was questioned.

That said, it's a bit ironic that several UK based players with decidedly shady "poker histories" routinely get woohooed, ballyhooed and well doned by most of the blonde community. (There not blondeites(at least that I know of)  before you ask)

probably one for another thread that ron.

The comment flushy made was a joke but I will always take offence on that line, he has apologised and thats the end of it for me.

What if I was to say "You're bald and chubby!" WOuld that be something you might take offence to?    Grin
Logged

thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #100 on: December 30, 2006, 10:59:23 PM »


I don't see the irony.


It's ok, I do now. Wink
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
M3boy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5785



View Profile WWW
« Reply #101 on: December 30, 2006, 10:59:30 PM »

Not knowing the inns and outs - I am not commenting on what was "right" or "wrong"

BUT, knowing how much Ali spends in the Casino - if you dont believe me, watch him play roulette!! Then to Bar him MUST of been for something serious.

Then again, maybe it wasnt ?!?!

We will never know I suppose.

Nice bloke though Ali, have played many times with him. ALWAYS a gentleman.
Logged
ariston
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3762


View Profile
« Reply #102 on: December 30, 2006, 11:00:26 PM »

how could i take offence to that ron? I would take it as a compliment as in fact I am both bald and a fat bastard so chubby is quite nice tyvm.
Logged

ariston

better lucky than good
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #103 on: December 30, 2006, 11:00:55 PM »


The comment flushy made was a joke but I will always take offence on that line, he has apologised and thats the end of it for me.

Thought i should say i apologised for causing offence to Russ rather than the joke itself, he asked me to take it down as it offended him, i think he is being over sensitive but he asked and i never meant to cause offence so took it down.

Integrity gate is seriously affecting the Ali vs Saddam count.
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #104 on: December 30, 2006, 11:01:14 PM »

I was under the impresion that when you enter a poker competition the casino has a "duty of care" to look after your interests in that competition. Having accepted your entry money as a player the casino is obliged to look after your interests. If subsequently you misbehave  / abuse a dealer, and get banned then that is your fault and you lose your entry.
 But in Ali's case the incident had happened before the competition started and should have been resolved prior to Ali starting this comp.

Legally I would love to know how this stacks up but would like to think that gambling laws are there to protect the player.

Choosing my words with some care here, it's my understanding that Ali feels he has a case to take to the GC, & he wil be consulting solicitors if Grosvenor do not satisfy him. He thinks they have no right to, in effect, "confinscate" his chips.

I hope they get round a table & sort this out. Ali spends a fortune in Grosvenor, & Grosvenor know this. Unless he's committed a heinous sin (& I hope he has not) common sense should prevail. Of course, if Ali has been naughty, well, to be fair, he must pay his bill.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 ... 18 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.148 seconds with 20 queries.