|
Matt.NFFC.
|
 |
« Reply #1770 on: March 27, 2014, 01:10:58 PM » |
|
Michael Buffer the legendary MC confirmed for the Froch Groves fight. My day is now complete, roll on May 31  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
|
« Reply #1771 on: April 05, 2014, 06:35:43 PM » |
|
I know he probably gets KTFO but I'd love to see Enzo bring back the belt tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #1772 on: April 10, 2014, 02:02:31 PM » |
|
That's Chunky James Degale waving goodbye to Channel five and saying hello to Matchroom and Sky Sports. He'll fight on the undercard, then would become mandatory to face the winner of Froch Groves.
How the times have changed, I'd now like to see Groves knock em both out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #1773 on: April 10, 2014, 04:40:24 PM » |
|
I went to the first Degale - Groves fight.......would be amazed if Degale turned the tables in a rematch but would be an interesting fight nonetheless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #1774 on: April 10, 2014, 08:31:43 PM » |
|
That's Chunky James Degale waving goodbye to Channel five and saying hello to Matchroom and Sky Sports. He'll fight on the undercard, then would become mandatory to face the winner of Froch Groves.
How the times have changed, I'd now like to see Groves knock em both out.
Says a lot about the division IMO. Ward must be quaking... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
|
MintTrav
|
|
« Reply #1775 on: April 12, 2014, 11:01:59 AM » |
|
Pacquiao-Bradley 2 tonight.
I was super-impressed with Pacquiao in the last Marquez fight. I thought Marquez would have his number that time, but Pacquiao put up a hell of a performance. Walking into one doesn't change that.
I believe Bradley is a lot better than he is given credit for. Beating Marquez proved that, though he had a tough time against Provodnikov.
Should be Pacquiao's, probably on points. Despite being built like a bodybuilder, Bradley couldn't knock out his granny. On the other hand, he can take them. He survived Provodnikov's haymakers (barely). Pacquiao doesn't hit as hard, though his sustained attacks could do the job.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Baron
|
|
« Reply #1776 on: April 12, 2014, 11:17:37 AM » |
|
I know this is against opinion but I like Bradley tonight
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
|
« Reply #1777 on: April 12, 2014, 11:32:32 AM » |
|
I know this is against opinion but I like Bradley tonight
I was quite surprised at the odds for this thought they'd be closer together. Hope Pac's still got it, unsure though, looking forward to it. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 12, 2014, 11:52:11 AM by mondatoo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #1778 on: April 12, 2014, 11:51:15 AM » |
|
I know this is against opinion but I like Bradley tonight
Me too. It seems to be fashionable to back Pacman. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
|
« Reply #1779 on: April 12, 2014, 12:03:00 PM » |
|
I know this is against opinion but I like Bradley tonight
Likewise, I said earlier I made him a 6/4 shot and can get better than 2/1 on Betfair now. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Baron
|
|
« Reply #1780 on: April 12, 2014, 01:04:07 PM » |
|
Bradley by decision 4.7.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #1781 on: April 12, 2014, 01:06:41 PM » |
|
Bradley by decision 4.7.
Haha I was hoping to get more £ matched before mentioning that to anyone else. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #1782 on: April 12, 2014, 03:51:51 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Leatherman
|
|
« Reply #1783 on: April 12, 2014, 09:33:51 PM » |
|
Manny by TKO
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Satellite King
|
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
|
« Reply #1784 on: April 13, 2014, 12:59:03 AM » |
|
The Bradley drift continues. He's never a 9/4 shot here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author