icles test
|
|
« Reply #2190 on: November 18, 2014, 11:52:04 PM » |
|
What do Ward-Gatti 1, Eubank-Watson 1 and Tyson-Spinks have in common?
boxing?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #2191 on: November 19, 2014, 12:02:47 AM » |
|
I think the Hearns might be the biggest shysters in British sport.
Anyway, no one answered my question.
Should I being having Jake's college fund on Cleverly at Evens?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #2192 on: November 19, 2014, 12:21:58 AM » |
|
I think the Hearns might be the biggest shysters in British sport.
Anyway, no one answered my question.
Should I being having Jake's college fund on Cleverly at Evens?
I have had a decent bet at 2.12 on bf.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Baron
|
|
« Reply #2193 on: November 19, 2014, 12:32:43 AM » |
|
I think the Hearns might be the biggest shysters in British sport.
Anyway, no one answered my question.
Should I being having Jake's college fund on Cleverly at Evens?
I like the bet although not for Jake's college fund. Cleverly is quicker, fitter and smarter around the ring. He's less likely to be drawn into a war - for me he wins on points or late on. The last fight was closer than it should have been and Bellew is a serial underperformer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #2194 on: November 19, 2014, 01:10:48 AM » |
|
I think the Hearns might be the biggest shysters in British sport.
Anyway, no one answered my question.
Should I being having Jake's college fund on Cleverly at Evens?
I like the bet although not for Jake's college fund. Cleverly is quicker, fitter and smarter around the ring. He's less likely to be drawn into a war - for me he wins on points or late on. The last fight was closer than it should have been and Bellew is a serial underperformer. Before today's chatter started I thought the worst case scenario was Cleverly is a 50/50 shot. Best case scenario is Bellew has hyped himself up into a false position and Cleverly should be a decent favourite. Bellew implanted the idea that he struggled to make 175lb, so he'll be the much better boxer at 200lb. Everyone assumes that to be correct even though there's no evidence of it so far.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
|
« Reply #2195 on: November 19, 2014, 09:51:45 AM » |
|
I think the Hearns might be the biggest shysters in British sport.
Anyway, no one answered my question.
Should I being having Jake's college fund on Cleverly at Evens?
I like the bet although not for Jake's college fund. Cleverly is quicker, fitter and smarter around the ring. He's less likely to be drawn into a war - for me he wins on points or late on. The last fight was closer than it should have been and Bellew is a serial underperformer. Before today's chatter started I thought the worst case scenario was Cleverly is a 50/50 shot. Best case scenario is Bellew has hyped himself up into a false position and Cleverly should be a decent favourite. Bellew implanted the idea that he struggled to make 175lb, so he'll be the much better boxer at 200lb. Everyone assumes that to be correct even though there's no evidence of it so far. I'm of the view that the vast majority of times a fighter blames a bad performance/defeat on being weight drained it's usually more to do with the fact they are on the downgrade. They usually step up a weight and get fed cannon fodder which they blow away and they say how much stronger they feel at the new weight but more often than not when they are stepped up they lose again.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #2196 on: November 19, 2014, 12:29:08 PM » |
|
cleverly bigger than 11/10 on bf now. Looks like they are going to back the scouser so might be worth waiting to get a bigger price Clev closer to the night.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #2197 on: November 22, 2014, 02:35:57 PM » |
|
cleverly bigger than 11/10 on bf now. Looks like they are going to back the scouser so might be worth waiting to get a bigger price Clev closer to the night.
Cleverly's slightly shorter than Bellew on the exchange now and has drifted a bit with some of the high street firms. I was expecting money to come in on Bellew as it seems to be fashionable to back the future Sky Sports pundit.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #2198 on: November 22, 2014, 05:57:39 PM » |
|
What time does the card start tonight?
Nevermind oddschecker says 6:30.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 22, 2014, 06:25:08 PM by McGlashan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #2199 on: November 22, 2014, 09:32:26 PM » |
|
Is anyone watching this card or have you all fallen asleep?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #2200 on: November 22, 2014, 09:35:29 PM » |
|
Is anyone watching this card or have you all fallen asleep?
Sooner spend my money in a local casino than on a series of 1/10 shots and a panto.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
Micko
|
|
« Reply #2201 on: November 22, 2014, 10:07:29 PM » |
|
I'd love to see frampton v Quigg get made.
Mortgage job on frampton.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #2202 on: November 22, 2014, 10:16:18 PM » |
|
I'd love to see frampton v Quigg get made.
Mortgage job on frampton.
The cool kids ITT were saying that after Frampton's last fight Nobodies going to keep a straight face if Eddie dares to mention Rigondeaux in the same sentence.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nakor
|
|
« Reply #2203 on: November 23, 2014, 12:26:14 AM » |
|
I almost want Fury to win next week in the hope that one day he will get in the ring with Joshua. Will be fascinating to see how quickly they put him in with some talent.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shit post Nakor, such a clown.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
|
« Reply #2204 on: November 23, 2014, 12:34:01 AM » |
|
Clev's right is gone.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|