Tips for Tikay

[Tal]

Thank you.

Have to love Caesar's. 8/5 here and 22/1 in the UK. How do they get away with that? Must be nice to run a 140% book and have people happily handing over their money.

I'll focus on the proper sportsbooks in future.  Cantor book in the Cosmopolitan, IIRC.

Are you sure it's not +1600?

Is it possible the display doesn't have space for four numbers? Could be.

If it's a choice between that and Caesar's operating a 140% book on a three horse market, I know where my money's going.

Two guys wandered past while I was sitting there. One says "Ooh, it's +160 here!", in much the same way as you'd say "Ooh, Shaun Wright-Phillips is leaving". They then rushed to the counter to get on.

1600 would make more sense, obviously, but it was definitely just those digits on the big screen.

[The Camel]

Thank you.

Have to love Caesar's. 8/5 here and 22/1 in the UK. How do they get away with that? Must be nice to run a 140% book and have people happily handing over their money.

I'll focus on the proper sportsbooks in future.  Cantor book in the Cosmopolitan, IIRC.

Are you sure it's not +1600?

Is it possible the display doesn't have space for four numbers? Could be.

If it's a choice between that and Caesar's operating a 140% book on a three horse market, I know where my money's going.

Two guys wandered past while I was sitting there. One says "Ooh, it's +160 here!", in much the same way as you'd say "Ooh, Shaun Wright-Phillips is leaving". They then rushed to the counter to get on.

1600 would make more sense, obviously, but it was definitely just those digits on the big screen.

Sportsbooks in Vegas are usually very competitive on match betting on all sports.

It's antepost and tournament betting that they are complete jokes on the whole.

[The Camel]

Thank you.

Have to love Caesar's. 8/5 here and 22/1 in the UK. How do they get away with that? Must be nice to run a 140% book and have people happily handing over their money.

I'll focus on the proper sportsbooks in future.  Cantor book in the Cosmopolitan, IIRC.

Are you sure it's not +1600?

Is it possible the display doesn't have space for four numbers? Could be.

If it's a choice between that and Caesar's operating a 140% book on a three horse market, I know where my money's going.

Two guys wandered past while I was sitting there. One says "Ooh, it's +160 here!", in much the same way as you'd say "Ooh, Shaun Wright-Phillips is leaving". They then rushed to the counter to get on.

1600 would make more sense, obviously, but it was definitely just those digits on the big screen.

Sportsbooks in Vegas are usually very competitive on match betting on all sports.

It's antepost and tournament betting that they are complete jokes on the whole.

i didn't see the OP when I posted.

8/5
17/10
22/10

Is much more like it. The handicap % is almost certainly even tighter.

I think Colombia were almost certainly +1600.

[Tal]

Thank you.

Have to love Caesar's. 8/5 here and 22/1 in the UK. How do they get away with that? Must be nice to run a 140% book and have people happily handing over their money.

I'll focus on the proper sportsbooks in future.  Cantor book in the Cosmopolitan, IIRC.

Are you sure it's not +1600?

Is it possible the display doesn't have space for four numbers? Could be.

If it's a choice between that and Caesar's operating a 140% book on a three horse market, I know where my money's going.

Two guys wandered past while I was sitting there. One says "Ooh, it's +160 here!", in much the same way as you'd say "Ooh, Shaun Wright-Phillips is leaving". They then rushed to the counter to get on.

1600 would make more sense, obviously, but it was definitely just those digits on the big screen.

Sportsbooks in Vegas are usually very competitive on match betting on all sports.

It's antepost and tournament betting that they are complete jokes on the whole.

i didn't see the OP when I posted.

8/5
17/10
22/10

Is much more like it. The handicap % is almost certainly even tighter.

I think Colombia were almost certainly +1600.

Right. Those boys were in for a pleasant surprise, then!

[Ironside]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners

first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

[sonour]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners

first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

They look good to me too. Just need to be careful of a non runner.

[kukushkin88]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners

first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

They look good to me too. Just need to be careful of a non runner.

Both NR's already :-(. The O'Meara horse in the second would have been rock solid.

[sonour]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners

first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

They look good to me too. Just need to be careful of a non runner.

Both NR's already :-(. The O'Meara horse in the second would have been rock solid.

That's the end of that then

[Omm]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners

first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

They look good to me too. Just need to be careful of a non runner.

Both NR's already :-(. The O'Meara horse in the second would have been rock solid.

That's the end of that then

Thanks for posting Iron, nice spot and I don't look at the horses everyday so it was a great heads up, of course there were bound to be NR's, maybe next time.

[TightEnd]

Daily Report

Profit on Month £1532.83

Outstanding Bets £1354.85

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eCEvN9MELsUxB81rHuWrfoX3zwIMPQQ205Lcjm3kbgU/edit?pli=1#gid=25

a loss of £15 yesterday. England beat Norway 2-1 in the Women's World Cup, and the winner was a corker too

Click to see full-size image.

Click to see full-size image.

ongoing

Miiddlesex huffed and puffed as Worcestershire reached 195-3 in response to their 309 at Uxbridge

Derbyshire were bowled out for 207, a deficit of 32 under leaden skies in Derby. Now 109 behind going into day 3, surrey with 8 wickets in hand



Newton scored 27 in the second innings as Northants beat Kent. He now has 590 runs this season first calss, he is second behind Keogh who has 636 for the county

the white sox got smacked in minnesota



meanwhile....

Ladbrokes and Coral in shock talks over merger http://bit.ly/1Cp4b9s

 

[Doobs]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners

first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

They look good to me too. Just need to be careful of a non runner.

Both NR's already :-(. The O'Meara horse in the second would have been rock solid.

That's the end of that then

Thanks for posting Iron, nice spot and I don't look at the horses everyday so it was a great heads up, of course there were bound to be NR's, maybe next time.

I disagree.  It was a horrid spot before as it was an obvious dirty each way race (maiden check, 8 runners check, short priced horse check, big priced horses check).  Now it looks terrible at first glance, but I don't think it is.  You can back Poplar Close at 9/4 that beats Betfair and 9/16 top 2 looks like it is probably good too.  One for the shops as ever, but think your online account will probably be fine.  I won't be doing it as my beteveryday account has a lot of value to me.

[Doobs]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners
J
first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

They look good to me too. Just need to be careful of a non runner.

Both NR's already :-(. The O'Meara horse in the second would have been rock solid.

That's the end of that then

Thanks for posting Iron, nice spot and I don't look at the horses everyday so it was a great heads up, of course there were bound to be NR's, maybe next time.

I disagree.  It was a horrid spot before as it was an obvious dirty each way race (maiden check, 8 runners check, short priced horse check, big priced horses check).  Now it looks terrible at first glance, but I don't think it is.  You can back Poplar Close at 9/4 that beats Betfair and 9/16 top 2 looks like it is probably good too.  One for the shops as ever, but think your online account will probably be fine.  I won't be doing it as my beteveryday account has a lot of value to me.

And Thankstomonty 7/2 with 6 runners in the 2nd 7/2 the win beats Betfair and the 7/8 first 2 seems massive to me.  If you still have a Boils account seems as good a way to lose it as any.  Strongly suspect Boils will take offence FWIW.  It isn't like they need an excuse to restrict.

[stumpythefish]

update on northants top scorer bet.A bit of a double whammy as peters broke his thumb which meant rob newton has now been moved upto open which is not his favoured position.On the plus side I think he will just miss 1 more game which will give us a decent sweat for the rest of the season.Keogh is leading at the moment and he looks in great nick.ps the pic is from a vewry green northants wicket and that is my family sitting in the background

[Omm]

the first 2 races at Beverly tomorrow look intresting ew prospects i think
both have 8 runners
J
first race favourite is around even money and has 4 horses 16-1 or bigger in it


2nd race looks much better  with an odds on favourite and 4 horses 40-1 or bigger


or am i missing something?

They look good to me too. Just need to be careful of a non runner.

Both NR's already :-(. The O'Meara horse in the second would have been rock solid.

That's the end of that then

Thanks for posting Iron, nice spot and I don't look at the horses everyday so it was a great heads up, of course there were bound to be NR's, maybe next time.

I disagree.  It was a horrid spot before as it was an obvious dirty each way race (maiden check, 8 runners check, short priced horse check, big priced horses check).  Now it looks terrible at first glance, but I don't think it is.  You can back Poplar Close at 9/4 that beats Betfair and 9/16 top 2 looks like it is probably good too.  One for the shops as ever, but think your online account will probably be fine.  I won't be doing it as my beteveryday account has a lot of value to me.

And Thankstomonty 7/2 with 6 runners in the 2nd 7/2 the win beats Betfair and the 7/8 first 2 seems massive to me.  If you still have a Boils account seems as good a way to lose it as any.  Strongly suspect Boils will take offence FWIW.  It isn't like they need an excuse to restrict.

I disagree to a certain extend, I haven't lost 1 account in the last 2 1/2 years backing dirty each way races and i have done a fair few, I can only put this down to the fact that i am not betting in big enough stakes for the bookies to be worried about me taking £10's of pounds of them rather than £100's of pounds. Of course that may not be the same for everyone on here and that's fair enough, but to me that was a nice spot and im happy to take the chance on the accounts that i have and im more likely to get down town and use the shops if im able to get out. To you it was obviously a horrid spot and i realize im probably in the minority rather than the majority. Happy to be educated that there is another reason i havent lost my accounts to dirty each way races, whats you thoughts?

[BigAdz]

I suggested this a few weeks ago Omm.

If you betting is driven by purely sourcing bets from these sorts of races, I suspect you may well lose you account.

If you have a nice balance of stuff, and feed in the odd dirty bet, it goes unnoticed.

I am sure even bad punters must stumble across winning ew bet in these races sometimes. It can't result in auto closure, or the bookmaking industry would have shut up shop years ago.