Tips for Tikay

[tikay]

Am I missing something here?  BMU have 4/5 a first time winner for the Masters.  Taking the prices of any past winner less than 1000-1 and backing them plus backing the 4/5 seems to be a 93% book?

as   17   5.9
bw   67   1.5
cs   34   2.9
pm   15   6.7
ac   81   1.2
ti   200   0.5
zj   41   2.4
tw   6.5   15.4
vs   300   0.3
1st   1.8   55.6
      
                92.4


Surely a max bet?  (unless I'm missing something obv)

No love for this?

We'd have a goodly % of the field on our side!

I am not sure what it is saying? there are only 9 former winners in this years field?



p.s more people giving feedback would be great. Might have laid Liverpool or been Villa +2 (possibly) with feedback!

If there are only nine former winners in the field then I love it.

I also laid Liverpool and backed Villa but then I do all your bets.
Can I suggest Tighty's selections have auto bet status ?

I'm off to work in 10 minutes, but I did want to answer that one first.

He does have auto-bet status already, but (working from memory) this was a "thinking out loud/looking for opinions & feedback" thing. (Villa v Liverpool).

There was no feedback that I can recall from football experts or Elders, (apologies if I missed it) so I bumped it 2 days later, ditto ditto.

In truth, all that happened was Fred never got on, but many people did, including me, though I just went for the win, & so I lost. 

Well done on the Ladbrokes coup. Will you be taking cake with you when you collect?

[Rubbish2407]

Can't wait to read about the Ladbroke's carnage tomorrow.

[Ant040689]

Can't wait to read about the Ladbroke's carnage tomorrow.

Same. But interested to know what guys are expected to return from a 3-1 scoreline and would it get near surpassing their outlay if they did do 100 markets?

I am a little confused by it, so don't bit my head off for idiocy. I know it obviously depends on what you bet on, on which market, but what are people looking back on their outlay discarding their free bets, for arguments sake?

[claypole]

I booked Laddies....was chatting to a mate at 76 mins saying they at least have a semi decent trader who's designed the offer, obviously -ev to them, however huge volume increase, give yourself a chance, Man Utd terrible blah blah blah.

Be interesting to see how it pans out.....they'll honour I think although the shop angle could be interesting.

[tikay]

Gotta go to work now, have a great evening, & good luck all with Knowshow & Montee. (Where DO they get these monikers from?!).

[TightEnd]

Can't wait to read about the Ladbroke's carnage tomorrow.

Same. But interested to know what guys are expected to return from a 3-1 scoreline and would it get near surpassing their outlay if they did do 100 markets?

I am a little confused by it, so don't bit my head off for idiocy. I know it obviously depends on what you bet on, on which market, but what are people looking back on their outlay discarding their free bets, for arguments sake?

Chelsea 3-1
Chelsea H T-FT
BTTS
Red Card
Eto'o in the top three of the FGoal market

all would have seen punters on them

several hundred shops, all would have seen x extra customers betting £25 a pop on y markets..and they refund every loser?

Must be a loser of an offer as it turns out

Obv if United don't score they see a significant volume uplift

Ladbrokes results in a few weeks will be fun for the under rpessure Chief Exec.

[The Camel]

How much do we think this cost Ladbrokes?

I'm going to guess £10 million.

But it really could be a load more.

I have no clue.

[tikay]

How much do we think this cost Ladbrokes?

I'm going to guess £10 million.

But it really could be a load more.

I have no clue.

I've no idea, but that would be more than they lost on the Football last weekend & midweek, imo.

[horseplayer]

tikay did you get on Donny?

[TightEnd]

Yellow card



Red card

[horseplayer]

both reds imo

[Dubai]

Can't wait to read about the Ladbroke's carnage tomorrow.

Same. But interested to know what guys are expected to return from a 3-1 scoreline and would it get near surpassing their outlay if they did do 100 markets?

I am a little confused by it, so don't bit my head off for idiocy. I know it obviously depends on what you bet on, on which market, but what are people looking back on their outlay discarding their free bets, for arguments sake?

Chelsea 3-1
Chelsea H T-FT
BTTS
Red Card
Eto'o in the top three of the FGoal market

all would have seen punters on them

several hundred shops, all would have seen x extra customers betting £25 a pop on y markets..and they refund every loser?

Must be a loser of an offer as it turns out

Obv if United don't score they see a significant volume uplift

Ladbrokes results in a few weeks will be fun for the under rpessure Chief Exec.

Anyone that specifically had a bet with ladbrokes because of the offer and thought Chelsea 3-1 or both teams to score was a good way to go about it should be allowed to place bets for the rest of their life's.

[The Camel]

Can't wait to read about the Ladbroke's carnage tomorrow.

Same. But interested to know what guys are expected to return from a 3-1 scoreline and would it get near surpassing their outlay if they did do 100 markets?

I am a little confused by it, so don't bit my head off for idiocy. I know it obviously depends on what you bet on, on which market, but what are people looking back on their outlay discarding their free bets, for arguments sake?

Chelsea 3-1
Chelsea H T-FT
BTTS
Red Card
Eto'o in the top three of the FGoal market

all would have seen punters on them

several hundred shops, all would have seen x extra customers betting £25 a pop on y markets..and they refund every loser?

Must be a loser of an offer as it turns out

Obv if United don't score they see a significant volume uplift

Ladbrokes results in a few weeks will be fun for the under rpessure Chief Exec.

Anyone that specifically had a bet with ladbrokes because of the offer and thought Chelsea 3-1 or both teams to score was a good way to go about it should be allowed to place bets for the rest of their life's.

Both teams to score was excluded from the offer if I remember correctly.

[horseplayer]

correct btts was excluded for obvious reasons

[The Camel]

Can't wait to read about the Ladbroke's carnage tomorrow.

Same. But interested to know what guys are expected to return from a 3-1 scoreline and would it get near surpassing their outlay if they did do 100 markets?

I am a little confused by it, so don't bit my head off for idiocy. I know it obviously depends on what you bet on, on which market, but what are people looking back on their outlay discarding their free bets, for arguments sake?

Chelsea 3-1
Chelsea H T-FT
BTTS
Red Card
Eto'o in the top three of the FGoal market

all would have seen punters on them

several hundred shops, all would have seen x extra customers betting £25 a pop on y markets..and they refund every loser?

Must be a loser of an offer as it turns out

Obv if United don't score they see a significant volume uplift

Ladbrokes results in a few weeks will be fun for the under rpessure Chief Exec.

Anyone that specifically had a bet with ladbrokes because of the offer and thought Chelsea 3-1 or both teams to score was a good way to go about it should be allowed to place bets for the rest of their life's.

1-0 and 2-0 were arbs all day today.

I guess 3-1 must have been close to being an arb.