Tal
|
 |
« Reply #106740 on: September 12, 2015, 05:03:33 PM » |
|
jockey believes his own bullshit lol. Poor call
Really? Or talking through your wallet? I didn't have a bet in the race so i have no financial bias. FWIW I was on Field of Athenry, so no wallet chat from me. If you push out from a position you can't win from and then win, and that push was illegal, you have to be disqualified.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #106741 on: September 12, 2015, 05:05:59 PM » |
|
jockey believes his own bullshit lol. Poor call
Really? Or talking through your wallet? I didn't have a bet in the race so i have no financial bias. FWIW I was on Field of Athenry, so no wallet chat from me. If you push out from a position you can't win from and then win, and that push was illegal, you have to be disqualified. I wish more of the stewards grew a pair and reversed decisions. Would act as a deterrent for other jockeys to know they can't take these chances and get away with them like so often happens.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #106742 on: September 12, 2015, 05:07:43 PM » |
|
jockey believes his own bullshit lol. Poor call
Really? Or talking through your wallet? I didn't have a bet in the race so i have no financial bias. Got paid either way. If bondi beach does nothing to simple verse the results fine, but he ran into her twice aswell, probably caused the reaction in the second one. I backed bondi beach last time out and didnt think it should get the race either, think hes a monkey tbh, and wouldnt have went past.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #106743 on: September 12, 2015, 05:08:02 PM » |
|
Angry jock gets his revenge in the next. Fair play to him.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #106744 on: September 12, 2015, 05:09:57 PM » |
|
Angry jock gets his revenge in the next. Fair play to him.
lol 15k is really revenge for 400k
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
 |
« Reply #106745 on: September 12, 2015, 05:20:41 PM » |
|
Funny if it's reversed on appeal, and the bookies have to go chasing punters 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
arbboy
|
 |
« Reply #106746 on: September 12, 2015, 05:21:47 PM » |
|
Funny if it's reversed on appeal, and the bookies have to go chasing punters  Geoff Bank's blog and twitter feed will go into meltdown if that happens again!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #106747 on: September 12, 2015, 05:23:34 PM » |
|
Funny if it's reversed on appeal, and the bookies have to go chasing punters  Thats the only real winner of the situation, the bookies who just pay on both results.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #106748 on: September 12, 2015, 05:38:44 PM » |
|
peel dungbeetle off the roof
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tikay
|
 |
« Reply #106749 on: September 12, 2015, 05:40:24 PM » |
|
Corners bet already won in Carlisle game. 13 so far.
2-1 Carlisle though.
Nice one Rick.
|
|
|
Logged
|
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
|
|
|
Dekka
|
 |
« Reply #106750 on: September 12, 2015, 05:54:54 PM » |
|
I didn't have a bet in the Leger either fwiw but I do think it is time to try and get more consistency in stewarding. There have been too many dramas recently and we had the Speculative Bid fiasco too. Any plausible reason why a team of stewards can't now sit somewhere centrally and oversee all races at all courses? The technology is there and I can only see this improving their decision making and also the public's perception of them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only dead fish swim with the stream
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #106751 on: September 12, 2015, 06:05:26 PM » |
|
I didn't have a bet in the Leger either fwiw but I do think it is time to try and get more consistency in stewarding. There have been too many dramas recently and we had the Speculative Bid fiasco too. Any plausible reason why a team of stewards can't now sit somewhere centrally and oversee all races at all courses? The technology is there and I can only see this improving their decision making and also the public's perception of them.
UK are largely consistent, rarely overturn one. The only consistency you can really have is to have is no leniency system as with north america/france which is farcical. In britain we tend to give the winner the benefit of the doubt and punish the jockey, which imo is the correct approach, we can never predict what happens given interference didnt take place. The porblem with this decision is it flies in the face of recent decisions that havent been overturned. Totally agree there should be one panel but the old boys club that is racecourses wouldnt let it happen.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohnCharver
|
 |
« Reply #106752 on: September 12, 2015, 06:34:47 PM » |
|
lol lets see what the irish do.......
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
 |
« Reply #106753 on: September 12, 2015, 06:36:51 PM » |
|
lol lets see what the irish do.......
Makes any difference that Found got second? 1/3 the race result stays... (This one might be through my wallet...Rotten aftertiming, sorry)
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
Dekka
|
 |
« Reply #106754 on: September 12, 2015, 06:39:33 PM » |
|
This'll be interesting. Looks to me like it was the shadow of the grandstand it swerved. Good luck to anyone with a few bob resting on this whatever way you want the decision to go.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only dead fish swim with the stream
|
|
|
|