poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
April 27, 2024, 06:56:50 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272597
Posts in
66755
Topics by
16946
Members
Latest Member:
KobeTaylor
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Diaries and Blogs
Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
9
10
11
12
[
13
]
14
15
16
17
...
42
Author
Topic: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary (Read 129020 times)
doubleup
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7056
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #180 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:08:42 PM »
Quote from: The Camel on June 04, 2012, 04:26:09 PM
As he put in 2500, which
was more than half my initial raise,
he should have been forced to complete the raise to 2800.
Don't what to rub, but this is irrelevant imo. Obv he just didn't see your raise and is a lying pos saying he was just calling. So the ruling should have been based on him not seeing your raise (and some might rule that he can call).
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #181 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:17:54 PM »
Quote from: doubleup on June 04, 2012, 05:08:42 PM
Quote from: The Camel on June 04, 2012, 04:26:09 PM
As he put in 2500, which
was more than half my initial raise,
he should have been forced to complete the raise to 2800.
Don't what to rub, but this is irrelevant imo. Obv he just didn't see your raise and is a lying pos saying he was just calling. So the ruling should have been based on him not seeing your raise (and some might rule that he can call).
It doesn't matter if he didn't see my raise or not.
The ruling was straight forward and simple and I've seen it made 100s of times.
It should have been considered a raise.
He can easily angle shoot me. If I don't want to reraise, he knows I'm weak and he's getting more chips in the pot in position. If i do want to reraise he cries he doesn't want to raise.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #182 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:31:30 PM »
If I had to put money on what was going through his drug addled mind I would guess he thought I was the bb and the actual bb was the sb. (I was raising utg and there was a dead sb).
If he'd realised I had raised utg, he would have folded.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
doubleup
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7056
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #183 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:42:17 PM »
Roberts Rules
12. A player who bets or calls by releasing chips into the pot is bound by that action. However, if you are unaware that the pot has been raised, you may withdraw that money and reconsider your action, provided that no one else has acted after you.
That does refer to cash tho.
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #184 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:49:33 PM »
Quote from: doubleup on June 04, 2012, 05:42:17 PM
Roberts Rules
12. A player who bets or calls by releasing chips into the pot is bound by that action. However, if you are unaware that the pot has been raised, you may withdraw that money and reconsider your action, provided that no one else has acted after you.
That does refer to cash tho.
I put more than double the bb in the pot and the dealer announced "raise"
What more indication does he need?
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
titaniumbean
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10048
Equity means nothing.
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #185 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:54:21 PM »
wats a space cadet btw?
I had some really extreme experiences with the floor staff at the wsop in general I found the cash games had excellent floor staff the tournaments definitely not so. :s GL
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20912
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #186 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:55:57 PM »
Quote from: titaniumbean on June 04, 2012, 05:54:21 PM
wats a space cadet btw?
lol
Someone who's mind is in space, whether it be through drugs or just a natural dopey bastardness like my mate Anil.
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #187 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:57:41 PM »
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=space%20cadet
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
titaniumbean
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10048
Equity means nothing.
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #188 on:
June 04, 2012, 05:59:29 PM »
lol so amazing
but rather one who is so easily lost in reverie that he or she loses all awareness of the surrounding physical world.
man that's a great skill to have for live poker.
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #189 on:
June 04, 2012, 07:31:43 PM »
Been for a swim and now refreshed, with a positive mental attitude and ready to slay some dragons!
I'm 358 of 514.
342 get moniez. Let's go!
«
Last Edit: June 04, 2012, 07:34:53 PM by The Camel
»
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20912
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #190 on:
June 04, 2012, 07:32:17 PM »
gl keefy orkins
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Graham C
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20678
Moo
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #191 on:
June 04, 2012, 09:01:56 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on June 04, 2012, 07:32:17 PM
gl keefy orkins
Logged
@silobass
My Photos
DMorgan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4449
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #192 on:
June 04, 2012, 09:02:05 PM »
Jamie Sykes had a similar ruling go against him at DTD but he was in space cadets position. Guy mins to 1200 at 300/600, jamie puts in two 1k chips and says nothing, gets ruled as a call.
I didn't agree with that ruling either fwiw but they quoted some bs about them all being the same denomination chips and that if it was one less it'd be a call so it was taken as a call.
gl today!
Logged
Quote from: Karabiner on May 24, 2014, 12:47:13 PM
Is Dan awake yet?
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #193 on:
June 04, 2012, 09:08:03 PM »
Quote from: DMorgan on June 04, 2012, 09:02:05 PM
Jamie Sykes had a similar ruling go against him at DTD but he was in space cadets position. Guy mins to 1200 at 300/600, jamie puts in two 1k chips and says nothing, gets ruled as a call.
I didn't agree with that ruling either fwiw but they quoted some bs about them all being the same denomination chips and that if it was one less it'd be a call so it was taken as a call.
gl today!
100% the correct ruling by tda rules even though I think the rule itself is terrible
see discussion here from 2 days ago
http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=57979.0
rule is
39: Multiple Chip Betting
When facing a bet, unless a raise is first declared, multiple same-denomination chips is a call if removing one chip leaves less than the call amount. Example of a call: preflop, blinds are 200-400: A raises to 1200 total (an 800 raise), B puts out two 1000 chips without declaring raise. This is just a call because removing one 1000 chip leaves less than the amount needed to call the 1200 bet. Placing mixed denomination chips in the pot is governed by the 50% standard in Rule 37.
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13363
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Vegas, but no Aftermath - Diary
«
Reply #194 on:
June 04, 2012, 09:11:40 PM »
keith!
I bumped into your cousin Brian today at Yorkshire Wildlife Park - he asked me to say hi! (pics to follow)
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Pages:
1
...
9
10
11
12
[
13
]
14
15
16
17
...
42
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...