blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 20, 2024, 12:03:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272539 Posts in 66754 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Sunday Storm 22 left
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Sunday Storm 22 left  (Read 6760 times)
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2448



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: April 05, 2013, 02:37:55 PM »

I don't shove either hand. I just said I would rather have 9Ts than ATo
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
mulhuzz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3022



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: April 05, 2013, 02:40:14 PM »

I don't shove either hand. I just said I would rather have 9Ts than ATo

i know, but I'm still interested in how wide you think he's opening. I actually think he's calling wider as well, usually.
Logged
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2448



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: April 05, 2013, 02:44:48 PM »

I don't shove either hand. I just said I would rather have 9Ts than ATo

i know, but I'm still interested in how wide you think he's opening. I actually think he's calling wider as well, usually.

I obviously can't tell you his opening range. I don't think he will be calling much wider than 77 AJs AQo, flick in KQs 66 AJo even ATs and 9Ts still does better than ATo.

The more I think about the more trivial folds I think they both are.
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Pinchop73
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1438


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: April 05, 2013, 02:46:47 PM »

 Click to see full-size image.
Logged

First they came for the nits, and I did not speak out because I was not a nit
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16574


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: April 05, 2013, 03:07:59 PM »

Whilst I think he was a bit rude, the top 10% (well 9.8%) according to pokerstove is 88+,A9s+,KTs+,QTs+,AJo+,KQo and the contrived 77+, AJs+, AQo+ range that is close to that which ATo does worst against.

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

   2,198,598,336  games     0.001 secs     2,198,598,336,000  games/sec

Board:
Dead: 

   equity    win    tie          pots won    pots tied   
Hand 0:    60.532%     58.31%    02.22%        1282090440     48766860.00   { 88+, A9s+, KTs+, QTs+, AJo+, KQo }
Hand 1:    39.468%     37.25%    02.22%         818974176     48766860.00   { ATo }


Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

 821,905,920  games     0.000 secs   164,381,184,000  games/sec

Board:
Dead: 

   equity    win    tie          pots won    pots tied   
Hand 0:    65.484%     65.08%    00.41%         534867680      3346404.00   { 88+, A9s+, KTs+, QTs+, AJo+, KQo }
Hand 1:    34.516%     34.11%    00.41%         280345432      3346404.00   { T9s }

Guess you can argue all day about the merits of pokerstove ranges, but at least it seems impartial.

I'd put the top 10% as roughly an average rec's calling range.  Just need to work out his raising range now.
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2448



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: April 05, 2013, 03:20:22 PM »

who raise/calls QTs for 15bigs here utg vs MP? that r/c range seems crazy.
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Dubai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6040


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: April 05, 2013, 03:22:09 PM »

Cant imagine anyone snapping A9s, KTs and QTs and folding 77. Which just proves you can usually adjust stoves to make most sides of arguments to appear correct
Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16574


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: April 05, 2013, 03:30:11 PM »

who raise/calls QTs for 15bigs here utg vs MP?

The fella with all the chips? 

I agree with Dubai FWIW, but still feel the argument is a bit silly.  ATo is probably better than T9s, but no need form him to be rude about it, as they aren't going to be that far off. 
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 584

Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: April 05, 2013, 03:48:41 PM »

I want to apologise for my previous comment, not because I was wrong, but because of how I came across. I was playing at the same time and just quickly rattled it off without thinking about how arrogant the comment was.

I am surprised at the stove results, but I do agree with the range, I guess this just shows how long it's been since I've done any proper equity work off the table for MTTs (I haven't played MTTs for a living in over 7 months).

I am sorry again mate, I genuinely didn't mean to be such a prick about it.
Logged

Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2448



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: April 05, 2013, 03:52:01 PM »

Its cool, no biggie.
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Dubai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6040


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: April 05, 2013, 03:52:07 PM »

Yeah i think TL900s range is closer to correct than top 10%, brownie points allround for reply as well Jamie. We all type stuff on here that comes across badly as well
Logged
titaniumbean
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10048


Equity means nothing.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #41 on: April 05, 2013, 03:52:52 PM »

any bear4pricks about ?
Logged
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 584

Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: April 05, 2013, 03:56:36 PM »

Gotta own up when i'm in the wrong.
Logged

Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
titaniumbean
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10048


Equity means nothing.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #43 on: April 05, 2013, 03:58:31 PM »

Gotta own up when i'm in the wrong.

you must be used to it now brah xx
Logged
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 584

Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: April 05, 2013, 04:02:24 PM »

Gotta own up when i'm in the wrong.

you must be used to it now brah xx

Eat my fuck Beaneh you ass.
Logged

Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.123 seconds with 20 queries.