blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 28, 2024, 02:05:35 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272618 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  NFL 2017-18 season
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 Go Down Print
Author Topic: NFL 2017-18 season  (Read 198285 times)
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13285


View Profile
« Reply #1080 on: January 10, 2018, 07:54:28 PM »

Pitt never giving up a home game though surely like the mythical tweets have said?
Logged
Cavey007
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 862


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1081 on: January 10, 2018, 08:05:11 PM »

I'd be surprised if they did!
Logged

kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1082 on: January 10, 2018, 08:07:49 PM »

Pitt never giving up a home game though surely like the mythical tweets have said?

I'd be surprised if they do but don't rule it out against likely opponents. Could someone stick up the consensus of the tweet's on here? I'm a bit of a technophobe and don't really do Twitter. Much obliged.
Logged
Cavey007
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 862


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1083 on: January 10, 2018, 08:33:12 PM »

 Click to see full-size image.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2018, 08:35:01 PM by Cavey007 » Logged

kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1084 on: January 10, 2018, 08:41:29 PM »

 Click to see full-size image.


It just doesn't look realistic, does it. Potential #1 #2 Seeds playing teams as good as them at "home" in London. Raiders/Chargers would be good, the rest look unlikely imo.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24352


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1085 on: January 10, 2018, 09:25:01 PM »

 Click to see full-size image.


It just doesn't look realistic, does it. Potential #1 #2 Seeds playing teams as good as them at "home" in London. Raiders/Chargers would be good, the rest look unlikely imo.

Agreed. No chance.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1086 on: January 10, 2018, 09:28:56 PM »


What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24352


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1087 on: January 10, 2018, 10:09:48 PM »


What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?

Super Bowl? Chunky price would be needed.

They're in a very competitive division, have no offensive line and are entirely reliant on a quarterback who is, granted, a baaaaaaad maaaan, but is also injury prone (see no offensive line). If they dont win enough games, the frozen tundra won't be available to them in the playoffs.

Detroit could be the team to keep an eye on in the North. Depends who they can bring in.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1088 on: January 10, 2018, 10:17:57 PM »


What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?

Super Bowl? Chunky price would be needed.

They're in a very competitive division, have no offensive line and are entirely reliant on a quarterback who is, granted, a baaaaaaad maaaan, but is also injury prone (see no offensive line). If they dont win enough games, the frozen tundra won't be available to them in the playoffs.

Detroit could be the team to keep an eye on in the North. Depends who they can bring in.

Yep, agree. Will we get 25's? If The Baad Maaan still really wants it, he's just better, much better than anyone else. What price would tempt you? i think they'll be 14's.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24352


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1089 on: January 10, 2018, 10:50:42 PM »


What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?

Super Bowl? Chunky price would be needed.

They're in a very competitive division, have no offensive line and are entirely reliant on a quarterback who is, granted, a baaaaaaad maaaan, but is also injury prone (see no offensive line). If they dont win enough games, the frozen tundra won't be available to them in the playoffs.

Detroit could be the team to keep an eye on in the North. Depends who they can bring in.

Yep, agree. Will we get 25's? If The Baad Maaan still really wants it, he's just better, much better than anyone else. What price would tempt you? i think they'll be 14's.

Funnily enough, the Westgate Sportsbook in Vegas opened a market yesterday.

NE 5/1
Pit 8/1
Phi 10/1
Min 10/1
GB 10/1
NO 16/1
Atl 16/1
Dal 18/1
LAR 18/1
Sea 18/1
SF 20/1
Jax 20/1
Hou 20/1
Car 20/1
LAC 30/1
KC 30/1
Oak 30/1
Det 40/1
TB 40/1
Bal 40/1
Ten 40/1
Ind 40/1
Ari 40/1
Den 40/1
NYG 60/1
Wsh 60/1
Mia 60/1

I couldn't touch 10/1 with stolen money. Philly are in a much more winnable division. Rodgers would need 40 touchdowns and 4,700 yards for that team to win the 11 games it would need for a bye.

Tennessee would be backable if they fired Malarkey and brought in a competent coach. I really think Baltimore are overrated. They've just beaten bad teams this year. Luckily they have two in their division.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1090 on: January 10, 2018, 11:00:50 PM »


10's is very short, the whole market outside of Minnesota  looks priced on QB's. Looks like a New Orleans double at the prices:-). I'm max on this year and Brees will stil be elite next year. Backing Seattle, SF, LAR is burning money next year, we must be able to find an angle on that?
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1091 on: January 10, 2018, 11:02:26 PM »


10's is very short, the whole market outside of Minnesota (and Bortles) looks priced on QB's. Looks like a New Orleans double at the prices:-). I'm max on this year and Brees will stil be elite next year. Backing Seattle, SF, LAR is burning money next year, we must be able to find an angle on that?
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1092 on: January 10, 2018, 11:06:07 PM »

Also, Eli at Jacksonville would be interesting. It won't happen imo but looks an obvious one.
Logged
Sheriff Fatman
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6134



View Profile
« Reply #1093 on: January 11, 2018, 04:02:43 PM »

Missed the start of the announcement, but I think this is the detail.

Week 6 - Seahawks @ Raiders - White Hart Lane

Weeks 7&8 (order TBC, both at Wembley):
Titans @ Chargers
Eagles @ Jaguars (GTFI!!!!)

Yippee!
Logged

"...And If You Flash Him A Smile He'll Take Your Teeth As Deposit..."
"Sheriff Fatman" - Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine

2006 Blonde Caption Comp Ultimate Champion (to be replaced by actual poker achievements when I have any)

GUKPT Online Main Event Winner 2008 (yay, a poker achievement!)
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #1094 on: January 11, 2018, 04:06:06 PM »

Missed the start of the announcement, but I think this is the detail.

Week 6 - Seahawks @ Raiders - White Hart Lane

Weeks 7&8 (order TBC, both at Wembley):
Titans @ Chargers
Eagles @ Jaguars (GTFI!!!!)

Yippee!

Sounds great! Good to see the Jags staying loyal to London and I guess the Raiders know next season won't be the one for them. Best line up yet by far.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.144 seconds with 20 queries.