Tips for Tikay

[BigAdz]

No, Frankie, No!!!!!

[MahoganyVic]

Back to the 49'ers bet....  

Can anyone tell me why they are bigger now then when we backed them originally? As far as I can see they have achieved the best possible finishing position since then.

Is it simply down to the increase in form of Denver, Green Bay and Arizona?


I'm tempted to pile in for about the 5th time

[The Camel]

Back to the 49'ers bet....  

Can anyone tell me why they are bigger now then when we backed them originally? As far as I can see they have achieved the best possible finishing position since then.

Is it simply down to the increase in form of Denver, Green Bay and Arizona?


I'm tempted to pile in for about the 5th time

As far as I can see it's down to injuries.

Manningham is a significant loss but more important are the doubts about Justin Smith.

Without him Lynch ran wild against the 49ers and they failed to generate much pass rush against Wilson.

I hope he'll be fit.

[Tal]

...and on that point, I'm working on the assumption that the Green Bay offence will manage to overcome its leaky defence this weekend and turn last week's result around (Vikings out of a Dome - surely that isn't as significant as the press is making out BTW?).

But would SF prefer to face Rodgers and the passing game rather than All Day?

Is there a preferred result for our bet here? Is it just as simple as we want to play the weaker side?

[MahoganyVic]

Back to the 49'ers bet....  

Can anyone tell me why they are bigger now then when we backed them originally? As far as I can see they have achieved the best possible finishing position since then.

Is it simply down to the increase in form of Denver, Green Bay and Arizona?


I'm tempted to pile in for about the 5th time

As far as I can see it's down to injuries.

Manningham is a significant loss but more important are the doubts about Justin Smith.

Without him Lynch ran wild against the 49ers and they failed to generate much pass rush against Wilson.

I hope he'll be fit.

Cheers! Will hang off then until the injury news comes out

[Jamier-Host]

the other thing is he has/had a longstanding sleep condition which means he slept for under 2 hours a night.

Had an interesting conversation once where someone asked how much of my net worth I'd give to never need to sleep (as in always feel fresh too - not nasty insomnia).

Fairly quickly decided it would be "all of it".  I guess it depends how much you have to start with and how old you are, but having all those extra waking hours sounds handy to me!

[apologies for derail!]

[redarmi]

Back to the 49'ers bet....  

Can anyone tell me why they are bigger now then when we backed them originally? As far as I can see they have achieved the best possible finishing position since then.

Is it simply down to the increase in form of Denver, Green Bay and Arizona?


I'm tempted to pile in for about the 5th time

As far as I can see it's down to injuries.

Manningham is a significant loss but more important are the doubts about Justin Smith.

Without him Lynch ran wild against the 49ers and they failed to generate much pass rush against Wilson.

I hope he'll be fit.

Seen some very sharp action for 49ers today.  Wonder if that means Smith is likely to make it back.

[TL900]

massive fail from me, sorry boys. Spurs just havent shown up.

[Marky147]

massive fail from me, sorry boys. Spurs just havent shown up.

On to the next one, can't win everytime and the first half looks to have done us tonight.

[tikay]

Back to the 49'ers bet....  

Can anyone tell me why they are bigger now then when we backed them originally? As far as I can see they have achieved the best possible finishing position since then.

Is it simply down to the increase in form of Denver, Green Bay and Arizona?


I'm tempted to pile in for about the 5th time

As far as I can see it's down to injuries.

Manningham is a significant loss but more important are the doubts about Justin Smith.

Without him Lynch ran wild against the 49ers and they failed to generate much pass rush against Wilson.

I hope he'll be fit.

Seen some very sharp action for 49ers today.  Wonder if that means Smith is likely to make it back.

Currently 11/2 & 6/1 pretty much across the board.


http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl/superbowl/winner

[tikay]

Daily Summary, as @ 0910, Friday  January 4th              

PROFIT on Month = £209.60

Unsettled Bets  - £871.00


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aia1Hxq-NDNWdFk3UmlTSXMzTjRBTVNfOWRndVFsZHc#gid=18

[hector62]

Morning Mr T. Our friends Worcester are playing at home again so expect another tight game against Leicester. Without Tuillagi it is hard to see lots of points and Corals have obliged by giving a price for no try scorer 10 points higher than it should be. Some rain would be nice but I think the pitch will still be heavy from previous rainfalls.

Suggest under 37 points £25 @ evs  William Hill.

No try scorer £5 @ 22-1 Corals.

[youthnkzR]

Dont know if its been pointed out yet but:

Brighton vs Newcastle - Saturday 5th Jan:

Can get Newcastle @ around 1.95 DNB.

What do the experts think? Worth a punt?

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/fa-cup/brighton-v-newcastle/draw-no-bet

[tikay]

Morning Mr T. Our friends Worcester are playing at home again so expect another tight game against Leicester. Without Tuillagi it is hard to see lots of points and Corals have obliged by giving a price for no try scorer 10 points higher than it should be. Some rain would be nice but I think the pitch will still be heavy from previous rainfalls.

Suggest under 37 points £25 @ evs  William Hill.

No try scorer £5 @ 22-1 Corals.

Afternoon hector, & thanks.

Am mostly offline or ippy today, so will keep this brief.

Everything on as recommended.

Worcester - Leicester

UNDER 37 points, £25 @ Evens, William Hill.

NO Try Scorer, £5 @ 22/1, Coral

ON

04 Jan 2013 - Worcester v Leicester - Total Match Points

Under 37 Points @ EVS

Stake : £25.00


Estimated Returns : £50.00Transaction Reference:O/0457483/0000238/F

______________

SingleID:O/1597594/0000028No Tryscorer22/1Worcester v Leicester - 04/01/2013Stake £5.00
Estimated Return:£115.00Confirming BetsPlease do not click on any other link while we are confirming your bets. Please wait.

Total Stake: £5.00
Potential Return: £115.

[BigAdz]

Back to the 49'ers bet....  

Can anyone tell me why they are bigger now then when we backed them originally? As far as I can see they have achieved the best possible finishing position since then.

Is it simply down to the increase in form of Denver, Green Bay and Arizona?


I'm tempted to pile in for about the 5th time

As far as I can see it's down to injuries.

Manningham is a significant loss but more important are the doubts about Justin Smith.

Without him Lynch ran wild against the 49ers and they failed to generate much pass rush against Wilson.

I hope he'll be fit.

Seen some very sharp action for 49ers today.  Wonder if that means Smith is likely to make it back.

Currently 11/2 & 6/1 pretty much across the board.


http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl/superbowl/winner

Just been speaking to American mate who tells me Smith has a torn tricep and unlikely to make it back. If he does it will be heavily bandaged, and probably struggle to play half a match. Not sure how much truth in it, but he is AF mad, so see no reson to doubt it?!