DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #85020 on: August 12, 2014, 11:36:28 AM » |
|
Watford will ring the changes at Stevenage tonight but will still be able to pick a strong side even with 11 changes. I think Shaun Murray is value at 5-1 to score anytime from midfield with Skybet. Appreciate Fred can't get on, but thought I'd post anyway in case anybody wants a flutter. When Abdi and McGugan aren't playing Murray gets forward a lot more and I expect him to be the most adventurous of the expected midfield triumvate of Andrews/Murray/Munari. Lloyd Dyer and Fabrinni/Forestieri are expected to play either side of Ighalo and I can see this being a long night for Stevenage as all the players will be desperate to stake a claim for a place in the perceived strongest XI fielded against Bolton.
The odds of 7/2 for Murray elsewhere seem about right to me.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #85021 on: August 12, 2014, 11:47:58 AM » |
|
Like it Dung seems a bit of a cup specialist already at his young age
Hills looks worth taking for fred? pretty much same as sky
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #85022 on: August 12, 2014, 01:07:59 PM » |
|
Just to add to what Neil said re Betting Emporium. I personally have no problem if somebody used my articles for BE as part of their research and came to the same conclusion or was ultimately persuaded by it and then wanted to tip it on here. Obviously if it was a paid article I would rather they didn't reference that we had tipped it but, as Neil said, so much of this stuff isn't exactly rocket science and reading all of the available information you have access to is part of a punters job so if a subscriber read something and agreed with what I had said they are perfectly entitled to use it. I would freely admit that things that have been written on blonde have influenced me and some of the tips that I have put up for Betting Emporium but I think the key to smart punting is to think independently and be able to read everything with a critical eye and be humble enough to appreciate when somebody has a good idea or has seen something that you haven't. I think we would only have a problem if our tips were posted verbatim or every single time we posted and allowed people to know everything we were tipping without subscribing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #85023 on: August 12, 2014, 01:35:05 PM » |
|
William Hill
12 Aug 2014 - Stevenage v Watford - Anytime Goalscorer Tip It
Sean Murray @ 19/5
Stake : £14.45 Estimated Returns : £ 69.36 Transaction Reference: O/0457483/0001072/F
sorry am busy at DTD and tikay is busier folding in Omaha, but pop stuff up and will look when we can
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #85025 on: August 12, 2014, 02:32:41 PM » |
|
was surprised to see Warwicks underdogs the surrey line up is mix and match (other priorities and injuries), and the conditions suit the home side. can be difficult to chase when it gets low and slow Bet Type: Single Surrey v Warwickshire - Warwickshire 5/4 Possible Payout 90.00 GBP 1 bet @ 40.00 GBP Total Cost: 40.00 GBP Total Possible Payout (inc. stake): 90.00 GBP
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
simonnatur
|
|
« Reply #85026 on: August 12, 2014, 02:47:25 PM » |
|
Does anyone know how the virtual exchange races work on Betdaq? (Yes really!) They're promoting it and inviting customers to "trade it" - I'm assuming the whole exchange is virtual/computer generated as don't see how it can work otherwise. Hard to see how it's anything other than a massive scam from Sadblokes?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reluctant to race, came home in own time
|
|
|
sonour
|
|
« Reply #85027 on: August 12, 2014, 04:14:07 PM » |
|
Top 10 finish
Stoke 2.75 Betway Betfair 2.36 Newcastle 2.5 Bwin Betfair 2.18
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #85028 on: August 12, 2014, 04:59:57 PM » |
|
Does anyone know how the virtual exchange races work on Betdaq? (Yes really!) They're promoting it and inviting customers to "trade it" - I'm assuming the whole exchange is virtual/computer generated as don't see how it can work otherwise. Hard to see how it's anything other than a massive scam from Sadblokes?
Just goes to show why their acquisition of Betdaq could never be anything other than a farce. If that is one of the first things you promote on your new exchange you really don't get the exchange market at all.....in fact I am starting to wonder if Ladbrokes get anything at all...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
edgascoigne
|
|
« Reply #85029 on: August 12, 2014, 05:11:18 PM » |
|
Does anyone know how the virtual exchange races work on Betdaq? (Yes really!) They're promoting it and inviting customers to "trade it" - I'm assuming the whole exchange is virtual/computer generated as don't see how it can work otherwise. Hard to see how it's anything other than a massive scam from Sadblokes?
Just goes to show why their acquisition of Betdaq could never be anything other than a farce. If that is one of the first things you promote on your new exchange you really don't get the exchange market at all.....in fact I am starting to wonder if Ladbrokes get anything at all... They don't.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Allez!!
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #85030 on: August 12, 2014, 05:14:33 PM » |
|
Not sure how much more evidence we need to come to the conclusion they dont?
Re BE what is the position when BE puts something up (example was the Blackburn game last week) and a poster fancies the opposite. I had written a fairly lengthy piece that i then reformed into "just a fancy" after reading BE on the same game
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #85031 on: August 12, 2014, 05:23:52 PM » |
|
Not sure how much more evidence we need to come to the conclusion they dont?
Re BE what is the position when BE puts something up (example was the Blackburn game last week) and a poster fancies the opposite. I had written a fairly lengthy piece that i then reformed into "just a fancy" after reading BE on the same game
put yours up. don't even need to refer to BE.
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #85032 on: August 12, 2014, 07:24:23 PM » |
|
Murray on the bench. Assume we are void?
Sannino playing Ighalo, Fabbrini, Forestieri and Dyer in the same team in what appears to be a 4-2-4. This could go wrong if they get flooded in the midfield!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bad Beat
|
|
« Reply #85033 on: August 12, 2014, 07:24:46 PM » |
|
Pretty sure we back plenty of losers and I'm also sure that everyone that writes and tips for BE is willing and prepared to learn. Definitely love to hear counter arguments, I follow all the BE guys blind and sometimes it's in sports I know way less about.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pleno1
|
|
« Reply #85034 on: August 12, 2014, 07:49:30 PM » |
|
Helen now 8/1!!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
|