poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
April 28, 2024, 10:19:23 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272618
Posts in
66755
Topics by
16946
Members
Latest Member:
KobeTaylor
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Two chip ruling query
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
Author
Topic: Two chip ruling query (Read 7024 times)
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #45 on:
June 03, 2012, 12:48:23 AM »
Gatso, in ruling threads we seem to be in agreement most of the time, but I am presuming that you have the devil in you today
Every version of well known poker rules that i have read repeat this "rule"(the one quoted in the first page ott), the reason it's common is because it is sensible.
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #46 on:
June 03, 2012, 12:50:58 AM »
Quote from: dik9 on June 03, 2012, 12:48:23 AM
Gatso, in ruling threads we seem to be in agreement most of the time, but I am presuming that you have the devil in you today
Every version of well known poker rules that i have read repeat this "rule"(the one quoted in the first page ott), the reason it's common is because it is sensible.
I don't actually care about this rule one way or the other, it's fine, it works and it's fair. just don't really understand it as I think a raise would make more sense but there's no reason to change it
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #47 on:
June 03, 2012, 12:53:56 AM »
Quote from: gatso on June 03, 2012, 12:50:58 AM
Quote from: dik9 on June 03, 2012, 12:48:23 AM
Gatso, in ruling threads we seem to be in agreement most of the time, but I am presuming that you have the devil in you today
Every version of well known poker rules that i have read repeat this "rule"(the one quoted in the first page ott), the reason it's common is because it is sensible.
I don't actually care about this rule one way or the other, it's fine, it works and it's fair. just don't really understand it as I think a raise would make more sense but there's no reason to change it
It is just an extension of the "oversize chip" rule that is needed if 2 chips of the same value are required to cover the call.
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
JK
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2571
Probably the worst player here
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #48 on:
June 03, 2012, 03:00:52 AM »
The funny thing is, the reason I know this ruling and the reason I know why its like it is was explained to me when I worked at DTD. Happened to be Richard that came across and enlightened me/the table so pretty pointless me arguing the toss when Yoda is already in there swinging his lightsaber!
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20912
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #49 on:
June 03, 2012, 03:26:56 AM »
i agree with the rule. seems like the best way
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Doobs
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16577
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #50 on:
June 03, 2012, 07:23:12 AM »
Quote from: cambridgealex on June 03, 2012, 12:41:19 AM
Quote from: Doobs on June 02, 2012, 11:50:54 PM
Quote from: cambridgealex on June 02, 2012, 11:33:16 PM
Quote from: dik9 on June 02, 2012, 11:26:59 PM
Call, anywhere I've worked.
Bet is 1100 a player only has 10x1k chips puts 2 1k chips in its a call
Therefore if a player has a mixture of chips and puts in 2 1k chips without saying anything then the same rule has to apply. Cant have 1 rule for 1 and a different rule for the same action. If they want to raise just say raise ........ simplez
Finally some sense itt.
People getting tilted by what is obviously a good rule (see above) is tilting in itself!
Obviously a terrible use of the word obviously. Got to say I find that a bit tilting.
Thought you went to a school where they learnt you good English, sir*.
* Sent the other half of the forum on tilt there.
Terrible grammatically or terrible in that you disagree?
Btw, if using the phrase "learnt you good English" was intentional irony, wp.
As gatso said
You could say "obviously a good ruling" or " obviously the correct rule", but " obviously a good rule" can't be correct. We can show it isn't obvious by the number of people in the thread not realising it existed. I still think it is a bad rule.
Your pedantically Doobs
Logged
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
pokerfan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5620
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #51 on:
June 03, 2012, 11:33:00 AM »
Dik9, While we are on rulings.
Quote from: sharplea on June 02, 2012, 05:10:53 PM
Peejay fans unfortunately have to go and puke - he got it all in pre with
against Alex Clark's
and Clark had walked away by the river of the
board, he had to be called back!
Can a hand be declared dead if a player leaves the table ?
Logged
http://twitter.com/#
!/@mally666
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #52 on:
June 03, 2012, 02:04:18 PM »
If the player had tabled his cards which I presume he did because you know what they are, then no way. But IMO a player has to be at the table to turn his cards.
However, a player should never be called back by the TD/dealer
«
Last Edit: June 03, 2012, 02:06:37 PM by dik9
»
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
pokerfan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5620
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #53 on:
June 03, 2012, 03:03:21 PM »
Quote from: dik9 on June 03, 2012, 02:04:18 PM
If the player had tabled his cards which I presume he did because you know what they are, then no way. But IMO a player has to be at the table to turn his cards.
However, a player should never be called back by the TD/dealer
Tks.
Logged
http://twitter.com/#
!/@mally666
permanentquandary
DTD Dealer: Adam
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 38
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #54 on:
June 04, 2012, 07:09:14 AM »
So you're playing in a £1/£2 cash game at DTD and there's a raise to £6.
A guy flicks in two red £5 chips and says nothing.
Tell me, learned friends, how often have you seen this being done with the intention to raise (without any verbal statement of intention)? Why should there be any difference between that and this tournament?
Logged
"Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever."
robbiebox
me
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 259
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #55 on:
June 04, 2012, 08:23:23 AM »
I can not believe there have been 4 pages on this. Rule is clear and it is a call.
Quote from: titaniumbean on June 02, 2012, 09:45:35 PM
Quote from: slowrolled on June 02, 2012, 09:37:25 PM
it doesnt matter if it's two of the same chips. can be different value chips and the ruling is still the same,
say wut?
so a 5k chip + a 1k chip = two chips and should go as a call. the fact the two chips are the same is very important.
As for the above this would be a raise to a total of 6k as the 5k covers the call so the 1k chip is additional.
Logged
Luckbox is my most successful strategy.
http://bigdealinabox.blogspot.com/
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22972
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #56 on:
June 05, 2012, 06:56:38 PM »
I tend to play in games where if this happens the dealer just asks the player "is that a raise or a call?" makes far more sense
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5483
Re: Two chip ruling query
«
Reply #57 on:
June 06, 2012, 04:55:41 PM »
Quote from: Royal Flush on June 05, 2012, 06:56:38 PM
I tend to play in games where if this happens the dealer just asks the player "is that a raise or a call?" makes far more sense
Same, even though our stakes are a million miles apart
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...