|
Doobs
|
 |
« Reply #7380 on: February 24, 2017, 03:05:03 PM » |
|
What price Corbyn takes credit for Stoke/blames Blair for Copeland? Any 1.01 about?
weighed in. I have read this morning that those that oppose Corbyn are the "Far right" of the labour party. THE. FAR. RIGHT. I'd struggle to keep a straight face if I described Farage or Trump as far right ffs(though Bannon is much easier). I don't think it matters why Corbyn is disliked by the vast majority, whether it is the fault of the press, the plotters, or his own doing. Surely all that matters that he is very unpopular? Anything else is just missing the point. Though given the recent names mentioned as alternative leaders, then I am not sure there is much hope regardless. On Tighty's picture, I'd recognise all bar two, glad they had the names underneath though. Otherwise I'd have to resort to things like isn't that the one who is supposedly a contender for the leadership if Corbyn steps down. I have always been pretty shit with putting names and faces together and am getting no better. I agree with many/most of Corbyn's policies (outside Brexit obv), but he might be the most unself aware person in the country if he honestly thinks the public don't see him as a laughing stock. He has to go. The Momentum lot have so many parallels with Trump and his coterie of clowns - well past the point of groupthink to the extent that they are so fragile that accepting any criticism at all cannot be countenanced under any circumstances. To be fair to the Corbyn wing, I just heard Copeland described as ultrasafe on the BBC, when it really wasn't. Though you shouldn't be losing your 30th least safe seat in a mid term byelection. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #7381 on: February 24, 2017, 05:22:02 PM » |
|
1st Shad Cabinet minister to break cover + tell it how it really is in Copeland? 'Devastating' 'Painful conclusions' http://huff.to/2mkVn41| Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #7382 on: February 25, 2017, 10:38:56 AM » |
|
these were the (leaked) lines Labour MPs were given for interviews post the two by-elections an interesting look at spin and how it works | Click to see full-size image. |
 | Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #7383 on: February 25, 2017, 10:42:15 AM » |
|
change in vote shares in by-elections since GE2015 | Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #7384 on: February 25, 2017, 11:02:38 AM » |
|
this is from the times i think it merits an exclamation mark so ! | Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
Doobs
|
|
« Reply #7385 on: February 25, 2017, 11:16:31 AM » |
|
I wss thinking Dan Jarvis seems very popular then realised the middle line wasn't zero. Oh dear. Ed Balls any good? David Milliband? Guess Blair is a -40 too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
|
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #7386 on: February 25, 2017, 01:53:53 PM » |
|
I wss thinking Dan Jarvis seems very popular then realised the middle line wasn't zero. Oh dear. Ed Balls any good? David Milliband? Guess Blair is a -40 too.
'kin ell, you know you've got problems when no one is above zero on net like ability  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #7387 on: February 25, 2017, 03:01:20 PM » |
|
| Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #7388 on: February 25, 2017, 04:56:12 PM » |
|
Gotta be a wind up but funny anyway |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #7389 on: February 25, 2017, 05:15:18 PM » |
|
If UKIP had put up a credible candidate (not sure they've got many though) they would have won Stoke.
No question in my mind of that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #7390 on: February 25, 2017, 08:21:26 PM » |
|
If UKIP had put up a credible candidate (not sure they've got many though) they would have won Stoke.
No question in my mind of that.
If labour were is any way credible they would have won......Tories rule mofo  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
redsimon
|
|
« Reply #7391 on: February 25, 2017, 08:22:49 PM » |
|
If UKIP had put up a credible candidate (not sure they've got many though) they would have won Stoke.
No question in my mind of that.
If labour were is any way credible they would have won......Tories rule mofo they did win stoke tho lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #7392 on: February 25, 2017, 08:26:45 PM » |
|
If UKIP had put up a credible candidate (not sure they've got many though) they would have won Stoke.
No question in my mind of that.
If labour were is any way credible they would have won......Tories rule mofo they did win stoke tho lol Enjoy what's going to make f'all difference  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MintTrav
|
|
« Reply #7393 on: February 26, 2017, 01:32:36 AM » |
|
Go Hezza!
Real politicians again showing how pathetic the current front benches are.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #7394 on: February 26, 2017, 11:54:38 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
Poll
Author